Enquirer: John Edwards Punched Elizabeth
Pal: Edwards hit cancer-stricken wife in 'marriage-ending' fight
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 4, 2010 2:37 AM CST
Updated Feb 4, 2010 5:40 AM CST
"Elizabeth was so tormented by John's cheating and lies that she lashed out physically at him many times, even slapping him," a source tells the Enquirer.    (AP Photo/Matt Sayles)

(Newser) – John Edwards hit his wife in a "horrific marriage-ending fight" over the Christmas holidays, according to the National Enquirer. "Elizabeth told me the argument became so heated with John striking her," a friend of Elizabeth's tells the tabloid. "He forcefully punched her in the ribs."

The fight was the final straw that pushed Elizabeth to end the pair's 32-year marriage, according to the source, who the Enquirer says passed a lie-detector test. "She has the divorce papers drawn up, but she can amend them to charge John with domestic violence," the source says. Another source noted that Elizabeth sometimes physically attacked her husband, slapping and shaking him when they fought over his affair with Rielle Hunter. Click here for more Edwards-related gossip that puts both of them in a not-so-hot light.

View 2 more images
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Enquirer: John Edwards Punched Elizabeth is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 33 comments
Feb 8, 2010 1:55 AM CST
Look, Edwards IS in fact a cock-gobbler but I don't trust such AN ACCURATE news source, like "The FUCKING National Enquirer jeez, these are the same people who insinuated that GACY was improperly treated in PRISON....THINK PEOPLE....
Feb 6, 2010 11:27 AM CST
Called "brutaltruth" yet seems anxious to avoid same! Try and get this straight, brutal: The Enquirer REPORTED ON something that happened. It did not punch anyone. Are you asking for censorship? The press must be free! You, sir/madam are free to READ or NOT. But do not try to muzzle the press. We would all lose that way.
Feb 5, 2010 8:27 AM CST
The NYT knew about this story before the elections and decided not to run it. They said it was "a game-changer". They Enquirer was the more respectable rag in this instance.