Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

5 Myths About Health Bill Passage

Americans aren't undecided, and the public option was DOA: Cillizza

By M. Morris,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 21, 2010 4:08 PM CDT

(Newser) – With health care reform seemingly headed for passage now that Bart Stupak's on board, Chris Cillizza looks back at the debate and finds five persistent arguments with little or no grounding in reality.

  • Scott Brown was a game-changer: "Yes and no," Cillizza writes for the Washington Post. Lacking a supermajority, the Democrats have had to tread carefully, "but the meat of the bill—an attempt at broad reform—never really changed"

  • Bipartisanship failed: It was never really in play. After the 2008 election, "the distrust and partisanship that had typified Congress in the recent past left a bitterness that no election could heal."
  • The midterm elections are at stake: A struggling economy is always the elephant in the room. "Health care will indeed be an important issue in November, but it will be secondary to Americans' concerns about jobs and the economy."
To see the complete list, click here.

Opponents of the health care reform bill carry a Kill the Bill sign as protesters begin to arrive at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Sunday, March 21, 2010.
Opponents of the health care reform bill carry a "Kill the Bill" sign as protesters begin to arrive at the U.S. Capitol in Washington, Sunday, March 21, 2010.   (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
3%
7%
21%
56%
5%
8%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 79 comments
nmp17
Mar 24, 2010 1:57 PM CDT
I highly doubt the Supreme Court will choose to rule on this issue due to two forms of restraint against activism: 1) Ashwander Rules, which is far too detailed for me to post nor will any of you read it if I type it, and 2) The Political Question Doctrine, which is also too detailed to type on here.

I will however post links
Ashwander Rules - originated from S.C. docket 404 - Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...

Political Question Doctrine
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P...

Both links are accurate and to the point.
patriotaxe
Mar 23, 2010 1:06 AM CDT
I'll keep moving forward; you learn how to spell (I certainly wouldn't want to be a "looser.")

So far as the SCOTUS is concerned, you're correct - their job is to uphold the Constitution. Unfortunately, they have not. Stepping in to stop the Florida recount in 2000 was a significant deviation from the court's responsibilities, so much so that it has only happened once in the past (I know, you don't care about the past because you don't understand it). Choosing to ignore illegal wiretapping of citizens' phone conversations and email by AT&T and Verizon - a clear violation of the Constitution - cannot be excused by law-abiding Americans.

This is very recent history. Choosing to make it someone else's past is childish.
ChefDarrell
Mar 22, 2010 4:19 PM CDT
I'm just happy my Democrat Congressman voted against it. Even though it passed he showed some backbone.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne