Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Frontrunner Kagan Would Tilt Court Further Right

For liberals, she'd be a disaster, writes Glenn Greenwald

By Harry Kimball,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 9, 2010 2:13 PM CDT

(Newser) – The smart money's on Elena Kagan to be President Obama's pick as John Paul Stevens' replacement on the Supreme Court. The solicitor general is "exceptionally smart" with loads of qualifications and expertise, writes Glenn Greenwald, but she'd be a disaster for liberals. The former dean of Harvard Law School is simply too conservative on too many issues, and trading her for Stevens would shift the court "decisively to the right for decades to come."

Kagan is “renowned for accommodating and incorporating conservative views, the kind of ‘post-ideological’ attribute Obama finds so attractive," Greenwald writes for Salon. The presidents tends to avoid picking candidates who are "friendly to the left" for key posts, but he should make an exception here. It's the only hope of keeping the court's "fragile ideological balance" from tilting rightward.

U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan.
U.S. Solicitor General Elena Kagan.   (AP Photo)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The desire to have on the Court someone who has demonstrated fealty to Obama's broad claims of executive authority is likely to be great.
- Glenn Greenwald, on Elena Kagan

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
12%
1%
14%
66%
3%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 24 comments
antidemoncrat
Apr 11, 2010 11:34 AM CDT
What does being a Republican, Democrat, Conservative or Liberal has to do with selecting a Federal Supreme Court Judge? It only encourages the politicans to continue their gross violation of the US Constitution. We need somebody on the Supreme Court with balls that will interpret the 'Law of the Land' as is and intended by our father and founding fathers.
CelticValor
Apr 10, 2010 8:00 PM CDT
I've looked all over the internet for "Glenn Beck" and "census boycott", and the only hits I got was Glenn Beck telling conservatives to fill out their census or they may lose representation due to redistricting. Why would a reporter or newspaper lie about such a thing? Unless they want to trick conservatives into thinking these people really said this, hoping they will not fill out their census and will lose representation.
Illuminated_One
Apr 10, 2010 1:00 AM CDT
Obama needs to grow a set of balls.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne