Why There Haven't Been More Bombings Here
Would-be terrorists face multiple obstacles stateside
By Jane Yager,  Newser Staff
Posted Jun 21, 2010 12:12 PM CDT
In this May 2, 2010 file image, a police officer approaches the vehicle containing a car bomb and reaches down to lift one of the red canisters on the roadway in New York City's Times Square.   (AP Photo/APTV, File)
camera-icon View 1 more image

(Newser) – From the explosives in Umar Abdulmutallab's pants to Faisal Shahzad's smoldering SUV in Times Square, most recent terror attempts in the US have failed spectacularly. Militant groups who regularly and successfully carry out bombings in Afghanistan and Iraq have a much tougher time launching attacks in the US. Dina Temple-Raston explains why on NPR:

  • The Internet can't actually teach you how to make a bomb any more than "watching a couple of Major League baseball games on TV will provide everything needed to step up to the plate and connect with a fastball," writes Temple-Raston. Even the Harvard-educated math genius Ted Kaczynski spent years studying chemistry and testing his bombs.
  • Bomb materials are much harder to get in the US than in Afghanistan. The fertilizer in Shahzad's SUV, for example, was the wrong kind, because the kind that blows up has been regulated since the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing.
  • Successful bombings usually require teams of people who know what they're doing—financiers, explosive experts, location scouts—but most stateside terrorists have to work alone.
  • Even if you manage to build a bomb, you need to test it—and it's pretty hard to avoid being noticed testing bombs.

 

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |  
4%
4%
17%
0%
71%
5%