Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Google Glasses Will Push Info to Your Eyes Forget reaching for your smartphone »

County Closes 7-Year-Old's Lemonade Stand

Inspectors give her lemons, say she needed $120 license

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Aug 5, 2010 12:58 PM CDT

(Newser) – Ah, the plight of a small business owner, always bullied by unfair government regulation. Take it from 7-year-old Julie Murphy. Inspired by a cartoon show, Murphy decided to set up a lemonade stand at a monthly art fair in Northeast Portland. People were drinking down the 50-cent cups of Kool-Aid great, until a government inspector came over and demanded to see her temporary restaurant license, the Oregonian reports.

Such licenses cost $120, and naturally, Julie didn’t have one. Others at the fair encouraged her to give out the lemonade, in exchange for donations, but the inspectors returned and ordered the girl—who soon began crying—to close shop, or face a $500 fine. The county health supervisor stands by that decision, particularly because Julie had set up at a big event. “We still need to put the public’s health first,” she says.

A little girl runs a (probably illegal) lemonade stand in this stock photo.
A little girl runs a (probably illegal) lemonade stand in this stock photo.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
14%
1%
64%
3%
6%
11%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 78 comments
Misha
Aug 7, 2010 12:04 AM CDT
Her mistake was trying to sell lemonade at the county fair. Wrong venue, wrong product. Her mother should have set her up to sell hot dogs and beer at her local National League baseball stadium. I'm sure they'd have been much more understanding of the cute little girl!
Misha
Aug 6, 2010 4:01 PM CDT
The point people need to understand is the part where it says she set up her lemonade shop "at a county art fair," which is a public event, put on by the county. She was not merely out on the sidewalk in front of her house. So obviously if she is only 7 years old, she would have needed help, someone to drive her to the fair, transport all the lemons, water and sugar, etc. She (or someone in her family) was out to make some serious money from this. The authorities were right to shut her down. It would not be fair to the legitimate food and beverage vendors in public venues (the ones who actually buy the $120 vendor permits, and submit to the heath department inspections) if the county were to allow this child (and any child, "cute" or not) to come onto the premises of public events for the purpose of selling food and beverages. This is just another example of the media taking a story and pushing it for its "sensational" value, while ignoring the basic context within which it occurred. If someone drove their 7-year old to the local shopping mall and helped them set up a lemonade stand inside the mall, in the food court, would you expect the mall (and the other food vendors) to just accept that? Or would you expect that mall security would come around pretty quickly and advise the child to take it somewhere else (and no, not just out into the mall parking lot, but off the premises completely)? Of course the answer is obvious.
Ma'at
Aug 6, 2010 11:01 AM CDT
What utter bullshit.

More Newser Stories

Squeezed Officials Sorry About Girl's Lemonade Stand

To Fight Fat, Make Junk Food as Taboo as Tobacco

Senate OKs Tough New Tobacco Regulations

Fed Rule Writing Shrouded in Secrecy

J&J Hawked FDA-Banned Hip Replacement Overseas


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   Betty Confidential   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Fark   |   Timelines   |   The Frisky   |   Geek Sugar   |   NewsOne