Recession's Over, Need for More Stimulus Isn't

Voter backlash is about failure to lower unemployment

(NEWSER) - Paul Krugman doesn't buy the GOP conclusion that voters Tuesday rejected the Obama agenda. The election just showed that American voters are worried about their jobs, he writes, and this time next year, with unemployment still high, Democrats will likely regret not having been bolder on the economy when they had the chance. "Voters across America are in a bad mood, largely because of the still-grim economic situation. And when voters are feeling bad, they turn on whomever currently holds office." More»

'Short term is when government can be most effective': Paul Krugman

(NEWSER) - Not only has the US economy been "stuck in a rut," but now a "destructive passivity has overtaken our discourse," writes Paul Krugman in the New York Times . The common wisdom today is that there is nothing the government can do in the short run to help the economy, so we should concentrate on the long run. "This gets things exactly wrong," says the Nobel Prize winner. "The truth is that creating jobs in a depressed economy is something government could and should be doing." More»

(USER SUBMITTED) - Jim Surowiecki, writing for the New Yorker, says that the Obama stimulus package worked surprisingly well. Yet, Surowiecki notes, Obama gets little credit for it because he did the economically, rather than politically, expedient thing. Rather than lump-sum tax rebates, which consumers tend to horde, he gave taxpayers a small break in every paycheck, which they spent—stimulating the economy. By giving money to the states to retain jobs, rather than create new ones, he maintained stability and reduced unemployment. More»

And World War II isn't walking through that door

(NEWSER) - The US economy has been crippled by financial crisis, and the president’s too-cautious policies have failed to stem the bleeding. More stimulus is needed, but the public has soured on spending and plans to kick Democrats out of office. Sound familiar? That was the situation in 1938, writes Paul Krugman of the New York Times . And this time, World War II’s not walking through that door to save us. More»

Painful 'new normal' isn't good enough

(NEWSER) - Economists are buzzing about a "new normal" of higher unemployment and wage stagnation post-recession, but Americans shouldn't resign themselves to a mediocre economy, writes Harold Meyerson. Downturns triggered by banking crises usually cause higher rates of unemployment for longer periods than normal downturns, but the cycle can be broken with public investment, Meyerson argues in the Washington Post. More»