Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

Here's Rupert's Last Hurrah: Twitter

Mar 30, 09 | 8:35 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
This is an inside Internet baseball column, which you might not be interested in if I don’t begin with the punch line: Murdoch buys Twitter.

Here’s why:

On Friday, late in the day, News Corp. announced that it had hired Jon Miller to run its Fox Interactive division. Miller was, several executive changes back, the head of AOL. He may be the most successful executive ever when it comes to dealing with Internet companies that will never be successful because they’ve been run by non-Internet companies—like Time Warner or News Corp. (Among AOL people, if you ask, the last time anything good happened there, and pretty much nothing good has happened there in near 10 years, was when Miller was running the place.)

Miller, since his time at AOL, has put together a venture fund, Velocity, which has a portfolio of choice investments (among them, Broadband Enterprises and OpenX). So, it makes little sense for him to go back and run an old-line media company’s dubious digital strategy.

News Corp.’s is as dubious as any. It’s piss poor. Aside from MySpace, which the company lucked into, it’s got nothin'. And MySpace, once the killer social networking app, is looking a lot like AOL—bad technology, lower-demo users, no business plan, and no coolness at all. News Corp. has run it into the ground. (Up until last month, when he announced his imminent departure, News Corp.’s COO, Peter Chernin, was trying to offload MySpace in some fashion, and lock in some gains—but no luck there.)


(AP Image)


News Corp., for its part, has, with its acquisition of the Wall Street Journal, effectively rebranded itself as a newspaper company—a kiss of death. Rupert Murdoch, although the world’s least savvy Internet guy, nevertheless knows the Internet is a good diversionary move. He’s got to be able to say: “Pay no attention to the Wall Street Journal.” MySpace once provided that diversion. Now, MySpace itself needs a diversion.

Murdoch desperately needs somebody. Miller, with his promising venture portfolio, and his obvious desire not to get branded as the guy who runs dead Internet companies, doesn’t need Murdoch.

Hence, Murdoch’s promises to Miller must have been huge—the strategy expansive. That means a huge check for Miller himself, on top of giving him the ability for him to write huge checks to other people. Cash and latitude. I’ll bet it took nothing less for Murdoch to get Miller than a commitment for News Corp. to become the most aggressive acquirer in the digital market.

Facebook is beyond even News Corp.’s budget.

So the prize is Twitter. There may not be anything less than Twitter that can distract Wall Street from News Corp.’s stubborn and, at this point, unnatural newspaper fetish, and, as well, convince it, for one last hurrah, that Rupert isn’t…well, gone.   

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com
5 comments
VIEWING:
 
AS1280
Mar 30, 09 1:41 PM CDT
Twitter has no incentive to be bought by News Corp after what they did with MySpace. There are plenty of other competent parties interested in Twitter. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
ethical_person
Mar 30, 09 6:25 PM CDT
Mike Wolff: Rupert can outhink you any day. He is a canny old guy and I say this from first-hand knowledge. And newspapers are far from dead -- you just want them to be. Good luck witha that. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
JimDolan
Mar 30, 09 11:13 PM CDT
So, Michael Wolff, you're dining out all over town on your presumed "inside" knowledge of Rupert, while going out of your way to trash him ... not cool. Your biases are very apparent. Nobody's all good, and nobody's all bad. Rupert sometimes is a genius, and sometimes not, but he has accomplished more in any one year of his career than you have in your career in toto. How about you concentrate on actually building a real business, instead of carping about Rupert or the NYT? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
antoinezammit
Mar 31, 09 3:58 AM CDT
Mr. Wolff, you are not better than Murdoch. You refuse to apologize to the families of the victims of the HIllsborough disaster, shame on you. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
jamesnws
Mar 31, 09 10:48 AM CDT
Wow! That was a really bad write-up there. It seems like the more you opine on what Rupe is going to do (according to your creation of various rumors and possible wishful thinking from yourself), the more foolish and inaccurate you come off as. For a person who has written a (albeit less than successful) biography of Rupe, this is rather embarrassing. Let’s take a look at News Corp’s “piss poor” internet strategy shall we? First off News Limited (that would be the Australian subsidiary). They have a very good development of their holdings via News Digital Media and News.com.au is a great ‘portal’ to all their newspapers. They also have NewsSpace for selling advertising and recently have announced customized advertising for Australian visitors of various News Corp. sites – WSJ.com, The Sun, etc. News International (in the UK) is getting more and more of a strong web presence and The Sun online is the UK’s top newspaper website (ABCe figures). They will also be launching ‘SunTalk’ which I’m sure will be popular and increase the viewing figures of their website. Also The Times has teamed up with Sky News (39% owned by News Corp.) to development video content for Times Online. Hardly “piss poor” so far right? Oh, but there is more. I’ve been amused at how, in the past, you have tried to smear Rupe claiming he only knows about the WSJ because it is a newspaper and is clueless on other Dow Jones assets. This is totally wrong (but I wont go into that aspect too much) and the WSJ has also been developing well online. They have had a recent redesign. They are making a push on mobile devices. Also, they have partnered with The Australian to provide branded business content. There have also been various discussions of online subscription fees. I’m sure News Corp. can always monetize their online holdings more and provide better advertising revenue but as it currently stands, it is still not “piss poor”. Next up – Facebook. There has been a valuation of $15billion but most put the figure around $4 billion. News Corp. has a $5billion cash “war chest” according to recent comments by Rupe so if it is valued at $4 billion it could be brought outright and even at $15billion although this is expensive (and probably rather inflated), it is hardly “beyond even News Corp.’s budget”. I have liked some of your previous articles on Rupe and News Corp. and I have got your book but it seems the more you comment now, the more you are making a fool of yourself. I think until Rupe actually buys the New York Times or twitter or whatever other random nonsense or story you come up with, it would be best to stop commenting about Rupe and News Corp. because as the New York Post article proves, it’s not doing you any favors (how is the family by the way?) Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS