Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2009
| Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds RSS | Follow Newser on Twitter Twitter

OFF THE GRID
Jul 7, 09 | 9:27 AM

Did Rupert Bed Jackie?

Share
Is it really possible to have had as much sex as the Kennedys had?

Well, anyway, thank God for it. The Kennedy sex saga is really the story that keeps on giving.

Every politician who has had sex in office since the Kennedys were having sex in office is a pathetic also-ran. All of them fooled around in a sniveling, shame-faced, emasculated fashion compared to the Kennedys’ gusto, brazenness, and absolute disregard for conventions of all sizes and stripes—including, as the New York Post has revealed once again, Bobby Kennedy’s affair with his brother’s widow.

According to the Post, which got hold of a copy of a new book by C. David Heyman with all the delicto details, Bobby and Jackie were like two high school kids who, in front of the entire Camelot court, couldn’t keep their hands off of each other.

Of course, the New York Post believes that almost everybody who is anybody is wildly sexy. If you write a book—the Post itself isn’t really allowed to make up this stuff, but they can reprint it if someone else makes it up—claiming sex took place outside of marriage with at least one famous person, that’s a major Post exclusive. (Although, strangely, the Post was silent on the subject of my book, which had quite a bit of information on the extramarital sex life of its proprietor, Rupert Murdoch).


(Getty Images)

As for C. David Heyman, who he?

He is the author of Poor Little Rich Girl: The Life and Legend of Barbara Hutton; Liz: An Intimate Biography of Elizabeth Taylor; A Woman Named Jackie: An Intimate Biography of Jacqueline Bouvier Kennedy Onassis; and RFK: A Candid Biography of Robert F. Kennedy (how candid can a biography be when your subject expired many decades before it was written?), in which he first suggested the Bobby-Jackie affair, which nobody took very seriously, and which he is now suggesting, with the Post’s help, is a fabulous new scoop. The Post is always happy to revive a sex story.

C. David Heyman acquired his expertise regarding the Kennedys when he told Cindy Adams, a columnist for the Post, that he had been drinking with JFK Jr. shortly before he died and that JFK Jr. had told him he didn’t want to make the trip to Martha’s Vineyard that subsequently killed him, and was only doing it to drop his wife’s sister off. Many appearances on cable television followed after the Post headlined this revelation from JFK Jr.’s “pal.”

Now, is it possible that you could just make up the fact that Bobby Kennedy had incredible sex with his sister-in-law? That you could quote Franklin Roosevelt Jr., saying, "Everybody knew about the affair. The two of them carried on like a pair of lovesick teenagers," even though he was not a famous Kennedy intimate, and even though he is…well, dead. Actually, all of the not-so-intimates the Post lists as sources for the book—Pierre Salinger, Arthur Schlesinger, Jack Newfield, Gore Vidal, Truman Capote, and Morton Downey Jr.—are, well, dead. Forgive me, Gore Vidal—who for almost 50 years has been famously spinning fantastic and baroque stories about Jackie, to whom, by the marriage of one of his relatives, he is distantly related—is still alive, for the time being.

Anyway, I hope it is true. Sex tales are what keep the Kennedys as well as the New York Post alive. And where would we be without them?

As for Rupert…well, in the early '70s, shortly after he came to New York, he told me during a drunken conversation one evening, Frank Sinatra had him over for drinks and there he met … but you do understand you’ll have to wait until Rupert has departed this earth for all the details.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com.
18 comments
VIEWING:
 
Reader3181
Jul 7, 09 12:39 PM CDT
I agree with you. I welcome any old Kennedy sex stories because they are pretty damn sexy, and so remarkably perverse. It will be sad when there are no more Kennedy hangers-on left to tell them—even if they make them up. I would love to hear again the tape of a conversation between Johnson and breathy little-voiced Jackie. The 1950s coquette. Gee. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 7, 09 5:05 PM CDT
What would the Kennedys be without sex? The Bushes, pretty much.
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
mlorenzo
Jul 7, 09 12:58 PM CDT
great ending! Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Deebles
Jul 7, 09 4:49 PM CDT
Too bad Phil Graham isn't around doing that character from Revolutionary Road. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader3181
Jul 7, 09 5:07 PM CDT
But wait, did Rupert Murdoch really have an affair with Jackie? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 7, 09 5:40 PM CDT
Not unless she had some influence with the Chinese Government.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 7, 09 8:20 PM CDT
We'll never know because the Post won't tell us.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Reader3181
Jul 7, 09 8:25 PM CDT
It does sound plausible. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
GOP_4EVR
Jul 7, 09 8:51 PM CDT
But did Mr. Wolff bag Rupert? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 7, 09 10:06 PM CDT
Bag?
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 7, 09 11:26 PM CDT
I think GOP is asking if Rupert made you a better point guard.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 8, 09 7:28 AM CDT
I'm still lost.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
2-bits
Jul 8, 09 7:40 AM CDT
You don't have to be coy Michael. ;)
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
Deebles
Jul 9, 09 12:27 AM CDT
For Pete's sake, you can't be lost. I read it on Newser: Magic Johnson was trying to laud MJ and because of his self-absorption all he could come up with is that MJ made him a better point guard. It's a great phrase to add to the vernacular. Because it's a neat way to say that someone who influenced you not at all--somehow did.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
polstroad
Jul 8, 09 8:55 AM CDT
What kind of article is this without photos of the sex taking place? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Jul 8, 09 9:00 AM CDT
True, of all the photos of the Kennedys, I've never seen one in which they're having sex. Strange, no?
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
Deebles
Jul 8, 09 3:24 PM CDT
If Kissinger was right about the greatest aphrodisiac--and when was he wrong--then every photo of the Kennedys is actually a photo of they're having sex. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
fancygapva
Jul 9, 09 5:38 PM CDT
People have sex. Almost all of them, for whatever reasons (usually that their drives got the better of their judgement). So what? All of this happened between 40 and 50 years ago. What's the facination ? Sex these days is a LOT more adventurous and imaginative. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Nov 20, 09 | 8:32 AM

The Health-Care Wars Have Just Begun

Nov 19, 09 | 10:14 AM

Sarah Palin Deserves Some More Attention

Nov 18, 09 | 2:40 PM

And We Thought We Hated Mammograms

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 17, 09 | 6:50 AM

Rupert Murdoch’s Guy Gets It

Nov 16, 09 | 12:30 PM

Obama's Secret Weapon: The Hug

Nov 16, 09 | 8:01 AM

The President Wants You to Know He’s Too Dopey to Use Twitter

Nov 13, 09 | 6:55 AM

Does Warren Buffett Know What He’s Talking About?

Nov 12, 09 | 7:02 AM

Is Lou Dobbs the Last Conservative Pundit?

Nov 11, 09 | 9:07 AM

Who Was the Fort Hood Shooter?

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS