Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

The Health Bill Will Pass. Won’t It?

Nov 9, 09 | 10:52 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
I think they have it. If they don’t have the votes for the best and purest version of the bill, I think they at least have a fallback position which holds 60 votes.

I believe this has to be true because you wouldn’t risk your presidency and place in history and epochal humiliation if you did not have the votes. You would not have brought it down to the wire like this.

On the other hand, I could very well be wrong. It is not just the Obama White House, but something about all politicians that, these days, makes them look like amateurs. None of them fill you with confidence. Nobody seems in control.

Harry Reid certainly does not seem like Lyndon Johnson, who, as majority leader of the Senate, was never wrong on a vote count. Or, if he was wrong, he had a deal or the muscle or compromising pictures to make it right. Instead of seeming like a man who relishes twisting arms and breaking wills, Harry Reid seems annoyed and put-upon.

This may be the nature of politics. It’s just not an inside game anymore. What it is is an assault from everywhere else. "Inside the beltway" used to be a reference to the insularity of power. But the insiders seem naked now, unprotected, cowed, desperate to avoid the cat calls and insults.

Everybody inside the beltway has his or her head down.

How not to be micro-targeted, defined against your will and interests, made into a cable television goat, is now the central concern of a successful political career. Of course, a truly successful politician is a media savant, not just crafty and a show-off, but beyond personal humiliation (e.g., Sarah Palin or Joe Lieberman). But most politicians are not so successful. They can’t manage the media. They’re afraid of it. Their main goal is not to be singled out by it.

Still, I think they have it. They must have it. It was bad enough for the Clinton White House to have lost on health care and precipitate a generational realignment of politics, and their bill didn’t get anywhere near this far. If this one goes down, it seems reasonable to assume the effect would be cataclysmic: an overwhelming loss next year together with the rise of (or return of) an ever-more-forceful Manichean Republican majority led by Fox News. In fact, if the Obama administration loses the health care bill, that would rather officially make Fox News a de facto part of government. Fox News becomes, then, as important as the New York Times once was.

I wonder if the president seems to be holding his breath. It’s certainly getting tight time-wise. Another two weeks and this effort hits the holidays. I wonder if he’s biting his nails.

I hope not. I hope he is serene in the knowledge that this is in the bag.



21 comments
VIEWING:
 
Reader83540559
Nov 9, 09 11:23 AM CST
Why in the world would the healthcare bill pass? Half of the people in congress will have broken arms and legs if this bill passes. It will only benefit the members of congress if it passes. Not the people of the United States Of America. If helping the people of this country was the goal, they would just insure the people who don't have insurance and leave the rest of us alone . Plus they would work on tort reform and work to control medical costs in other areas. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
-7
IN RESPONSE:
QueenAlli
Nov 9, 09 1:20 PM CST
You have no clue what you are talking about. tort reform IS NOT THE CAUSE OF OUR DISASTROUS health care. IF THAT WAS THE CASE AND THE GOP believes it, WHY DIDN'T THEY DO SOMETHING WHEN THEY HAD CONTROL OF CONGRESS AND THE PRESIDENCY? Why didn't the GOP do ANYTHING for the poor and the middle class they claim to care for now WHEN THEY HAD THE POWER TO DO SO? And I wish you and your kind would lay a finger on a single member of Congress. The Dems will have no problem tying any and all future GOP /Conservative candidate to whackos like you. We have enough video to make that connection, especially last weeks "press conference" so keep them coming.
Vote up! Vote down!
+7
IN RESPONSE:
Snowleopard
Nov 9, 09 4:56 PM CST
malpractice litigation is only responsible for 1% of medical costs. anyone thumping this as the essential part of cost control is either a moron, a republican, or both (lots of overlap there).
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
IN RESPONSE:
dax
Nov 9, 09 8:12 PM CST
Reader...559 (wrote): "just insure the people who don't have insurance and leave the rest of us alone" --- Therein lies the problem. Leaving the "rest of you opposers alone" means forcing a sizable segment of citizens that WANT a public option to conform to the existing 'private funded' model, and thereby subsidizing YOUR wonderful private plan. ---- But unless you have gabillions of dollars at your disposal, you might lift up your gaze from your immediate situation, and look down the road into the future where the trajectory of healthcare costs are going to erode EVERBODY's well-being if nothing is done. ---- The one aspect of this entire issue that I have heard little about is how we are going to address the growing shortage of doctors and heathcare professionals. --- I thought "free market" was SUPPOSED to correct that supply/demand imbalance. Perhaps the monopolistic healthcare industry might have some palliative explanation that we can all hang on to for comfort.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
gelcap
Nov 9, 09 11:32 AM CST
right. so just to be clear, you have no idea whether the healthcare bill will pass, and what form it will take if it does? can i be a dick and ask why you thought that would be great material for a column? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
ende
Nov 10, 09 5:02 PM CST
hehe
Vote up! Vote down!
0
JBTipton
Nov 9, 09 11:41 AM CST
Ah, Reader83540559, Your internet handle is as catchy as your logic is impeccable. "Just insure the people who don't have insurance"!! Does Reader83540559 realize that doing precisely this--at an acceptable cost to both those being insured and to the taxpayers--is the crux of the problem? And that the opponents of this bill oppose every practical means to achieve any portion of a solution to these problems, as it would mean some reduced income to insurers, hospitals, medical practitioners, or all of the above. The reference to "tort reform" furthers confirms that we are in the web presence of a knee-jerk ideologue, not someone with a worthwhile thought to contribute. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+4
QueenAlli
Nov 9, 09 1:21 PM CST
Mr. Wolff, stop wringing your hands. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Nov 9, 09 1:58 PM CST
So you think it's in the bag?
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
OG_Travis
Nov 9, 09 3:20 PM CST
It sure seems to me that Obama is making it happen. No, he's not standing on a podium pointing at people, calling them evil. He is taking his time and thinking before he's acting. He's got intelligent YOUNG teams of people working on the issues and making it happen better than I've seen in my lifetime. I hope he is everything that FOX says he is. I hope he changes it all Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Reader83546882
Nov 9, 09 6:55 PM CST
I heard today that the Catholic Bishops are now pushing the pro-life murderers to press congress to press the no abortion issue. Who runs this country? The Pope, the Bishops, or those we elected to represent us? When did this democracy become a theocracy? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
dax
Nov 9, 09 8:16 PM CST
Reader...882 (wrote): "When did this democracy become a theocracy?" --- When the Right started wielding the Evangelicals as a political weapon.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
ende
Nov 10, 09 5:04 PM CST
Actually, dax, to be fair, the Catholic Church has always been pretty firmly in the Democrat camp. Not that I disagree with your sentiment.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Reader83546882
Nov 9, 09 7:01 PM CST
Apparently its okay to murder abortion providers, our military in wars, and to use the death penalty, but also to bring life into a world where starvation, homelesness, nakedness and abuse are the norm. Why don't the congressmen and women stand up and adopt the homeless babies for whom they profess to have such sympathy? I'll tell you why. They're too busy being congressmen and senators so their egos will be satisfied, especially those stupid Republicans who USE their grandchildren as show and tell for their stupid aruments. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
dax
Nov 9, 09 8:01 PM CST
So, Mr. Wolff, you're betting it's NOT going to pass, eh? ---- Nuanced opinion provides a nice hedge. I can dig it. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Nov 10, 09 6:37 AM CST
No, no, I think it will pass. But if it doesn't...wow.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
IN RESPONSE:
dax
Nov 10, 09 10:53 AM CST
Nice ! A nuanced follow up.
Vote up! Vote down!
0
doubleaseven
Nov 10, 09 8:00 AM CST
Yes Gel, you are a dick. Happy? How about an ignorant dick? Make you happier. Wolff's article is brilliant, but may be pearls before swine. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
DeniseVB
Nov 10, 09 6:47 PM CST
11 amendmets failed to get congress to sign up for this POS ? Count me out, and I will be contacting Webb and Warner in Virginia with the details. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
bewilderbeast
Nov 11, 09 5:07 AM CST
Of course, this is a really weird and totally unrealistic suggestion, but I think it would help if politicians actually had principles, rather than poll-watching, vote-counting, scurrying, huddled debates about which way to vote would least harm THEM (and their bid to keep their seat)!! That way they could take a principled decision on every issue and speak out of the same side of their mouths all the time - and not worry about being caught out if sentiment changed. Of course I'm going from the assumption that they're there to represent the best longterm interest of the people. Like I said, weird. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
Count-Spatula
Nov 12, 09 6:54 AM CST
"...you wouldn’t risk your presidency and place in history and epochal humiliation if you did not have the votes." -- Pfft. Nice logic. Have you not noticed that Obama is the disappointer-in-chief? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS


What is this?

The Health Bill Will Pass. Won't it?: Michael...
vanityfair.com

BECOME A TOP REFERRER:
Copy the link below and share it on your site.