Skip to: Content
Skip to: Site Navigation
Skip to: Search

TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2010
 |  Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook   Subscribe to Newser's RSS feeds   Subscribe to Newser emails Newsletters

OFF THE GRID

China and the Obese: The President Meets His Greatest Problems

Nov 18, 09 | 8:43 AM   byMichael Wolff
Get posts from Michael Wolff via email (Sample)

Follow him on Twitter @MichaelWolffNYC

Share
For all sorts of obvious reasons, it seems like a greatly unacceptable and possibly discriminatory thing to say that the obese are a lot like the Chinese (though it’s unclear which group, if either, is being slurred). But hear me out.

It is simple math. In eight years, according to a new study released yesterday, 43% of Americans will be officially obese (not just fat, mind you, but off many scales). Likewise, the vast number of Chinese people, with their new economic muscle, have become a difficult, unsettling, unexpected, and impossible-to-avoid presence in the world.

Obese people, by their numbers, and seemingly implacable resistance to the heretofore norm, are a big problem, with a massive impact on health-care costs. The Chinese, by their numbers, and their resistance to free market norms, are a big problem, with leverage over the world economy.

In a break from our usual approach to the Chinese—we customarily browbeat them and they resentfully give us some minor concession—the president has spent the last several days in China trying to get some sort of give-and-take dialogue going. He looks pretty manhandled at this point. Even the New York Times is saying that China’s “micro-management” of the president’s trip has demonstrated the power and resoluteness of its resistance. The Republicans will shortly pile on.

And yet, what else can he do? We stamp our feet but China only becomes more powerful. A new approach, even a seemingly half-baked one, is obviously in order. Not dissimilarly, it doesn’t seem to matter what arguments or opprobrium are heaped on the overweight; their numbers, girth, and hostility merely increase. We surely need a new approach here, too.

And the stakes couldn’t be higher. The Chinese hold the world economic system hostage. The obese hold the US health care system hostage.

This president lives or dies on being able to deal with the economic effects of both groups. You can’t get more basic than China and the obese, nor confront two forces more historically obdurate, unyielding, and often defiant.

How do you negotiate with people who seem to sense their own historical and, even, genetic inevitability? Who by the most obvious calculations are taking over the world?

Of course, as liberals, the Obama White House undoubtedly believes that various programs of incentives and other positive reinforcements will achieve some concessions. But they seem to believe that less. Rather, there also seems to be a new sort of realpolitik, not so much based on power, but based on the nuance and understanding of the world being as it is.

Up against China and the world’s obese people, we have come, it seems, to the limits of our benevolent or coercive powers.

They are just larger than we are.

More of Newser founder Michael Wolff's articles and commentary can be found at VanityFair.com, where he writes a regular column. He can be emailed at michael@newser.com. You can also follow him on Twitter: www.twitter.com/NewserColumns.
12 comments
VIEWING:
 
VinnyBlueMoon
Nov 18, 09 10:59 AM CST
Michael, I have an idea! First, you draw an interesting and correct parallel between the obese and China, and I feel there is a deeper connection here. You see, as the Chinese flood the markets with inexpensive/cheap products, and the savings realized by Americans are being spent on fatty food products. Maybe we should levy a fat tax on the products we import from China? The more we save at the Walmart's of the World, the fatter we get. So why not impose an obese or healthcare tax on the imports? We could tie the savings against each product directly to the health risks a supersized meal inflicts on our obese. Should the fat tax also be placed on the backs of the physically fit or skinny? No! First, they have much more narrow backs than the obese, and they're not the ones driving up our healthcare costs. I propose we place weight scales in front of each cash register at the superstores. Make it large enough so people cannot step around, or maybe even place it in the center of a cattle corral like the ones you see at a rodeo. A customer would walk into it and the gate closes, securing them in. The POS systems scans their identity off their discount card, and their weight is registered in the personl info. Immediately, the POS system calculates their height with their present weight and compares it against a height - weight proportion matrix. If they're overweight, an additional tax is added to the bill of sale. Of course, given all their trouble, a robotic arm holding a Twinkie jettisons from the cashiers counter and inserts the carb ladened reward into the healthcare offender's consumption orifice. Or, we could simply apply a fat tax against each ocean container from China, and allocate those funds to our healthcare coverage program. This may be the best way to go as I would hate to wait in line behind a group of obese people at the supermarket as they argue they have a gland problem and do not eat more than a bowl of cereal and salad each day. Not only that, but what if one of them becomes entangled in the cattle corral at the register and the line goes down? What if the Twinkie arm goes berzerk and starts shoving multiple Twinkies in the caloric offender's intake valve because the cattle corral is defective? Then you've got a choking obese person locked into a weight cage that the EMS team will have to cut them out of? I can imagine the various scenarios plan one could cause. Well, I like the way you think, and I'm presenting my fat tax to an area congressman today. V Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
loveonthedole
Nov 18, 09 11:18 AM CST
If health care might not have to pay for people who deal with their stress by smoking, why should it pay for those who do so by eating? Or better yet, why not pay for some good THERAPY in schools so maybe some of these future issues can be dealt with in more positive ways? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
njgreen
Nov 18, 09 11:36 AM CST
Does anyone besides me see take-out Chinese food as the hidden connection between these two implacable forces? Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+2
IN RESPONSE:
MichaelWolff
Nov 18, 09 11:48 AM CST
Good one.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
njgreen
Nov 18, 09 5:27 PM CST
Thanks!
Vote up! Vote down!
0
DNDM
Nov 18, 09 11:41 AM CST
VinnieBlueMoon - I love you. That was brilliant and... while I hate lines myself, and I hate waiting... I may be able to withstand them both just to see the aforementioned scenario. I think that makes me a bad person but it's too funny to resist. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
gianpaul
Nov 18, 09 1:16 PM CST
The "limit of coercive power" may not be exausted. Learn from the Chinese::One child per obese couple only. The pro-abortion folks would love that one... Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
rottenpeter
Nov 18, 09 1:37 PM CST
And yet, I'd rather be red than fat Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+3
JoeQ
Nov 18, 09 10:21 PM CST
Junggwo bi Meigwo da. Junggwo ren ye bi Meigwo ren dwo. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
IN RESPONSE:
JoeQ
Nov 18, 09 10:23 PM CST
China is bigger than America (the continental US anyway). There are also more Chinese that Americans.
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
Reader83547669
Nov 19, 09 6:51 AM CST
This obese-bashing is horrid, Michael. It makes me furious. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
0
schmidtkoff
Nov 19, 09 8:42 AM CST
the china problem is complex. the obese problem is complex. everyone wants to talk about the influx of chinese goods, yet we all buy them, for to try to find purely american goods made here is almost impossible. plus they enjoy our debt to them and they pretty much can do as they wish. the obese, well we can threaten taxes on sugary drinks and and demand calorie and fat content be displayed in our fast food restaurants and snicker at their piggishness and sloth, but in the end that will not dent the obese problem. they will have to grapple with that themselves. the china problem?, and it is a problem is to grow american business and manufacturing again. get going and be a leader with the green jobs and technology. Reply
Vote up! Vote down!
+1
LEAVE A
COMMENT
Comment Policy
Facebook ConnectPost this comment to Facebook?

After connecting you will have the option to post your comment on your Facebook profile.

 
RECENT POSTS
Feb 9, 10 | 7:46 AM

It’s the Sex, Stupid   

Feb 8, 10 | 7:10 AM

For Me, Palin Scores

Feb 5, 10 | 8:39 AM

Politics Has Lost Its Power. That’s Why There’s Gridlock

Feb 4, 10 | 8:07 AM

Rupert Murdoch Is Mad as Hell

Feb 3, 10 | 8:00 AM

Sarah Palin, Inc. Has a Problem

Feb 2, 10 | 12:14 PM

Obama’s Deficit Faux-Hawk

Feb 2, 10 | 8:32 AM

Jenny Sanford, Andrew Young, Gayle Haggard Tell Everything You Always Want to Know About Sex—Other People's

Feb 1, 10 | 8:12 AM

James O’Keefe: What Did Glenn Beck Know, and When Did He Know It?

Jan 29, 10 | 7:02 AM

JD Salinger, and His Way, Are Dead

Jan 28, 10 | 6:57 AM

The iPad Is Political

ABOUT

OFF THE GRID is about why the news is the news. Here are the real motivations of both media and newsmakers. Here's the backstory. This is a look at the inner workings of desperate media, the inner life of the publicity crazed, and the true meaning of the news of the day.

FeedRSS