Watchdog: SEC Sued Goldman to Bury Ponzi Probe
SEC official quashed Stanford probe then sought to represent him
By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
Posted Sep 23, 2010 6:08 AM CDT
Financier R. Allen Stanford steps off a prison transport bus at the federal courthouse for a hearing in Houston.    (AP Photo/Pat Sullivan, file)

(Newser) – The SEC in April faced the release of a report slamming it for bungling an alleged Ponzi scheme. So what's a watchdog to do? Sue Goldman Sachs the same day, the agency's own internal watchdog told a Senate committee yesterday. Inspector-general H. David Kotz said it "would strain credulity to think it was coincidental," the Wall Street Journal reports.

The report faulted the SEC for failing to uncover alleged wrongdoing at Texas financier Robert Allen Stanford's firm despite warnings from SEC investigators as far back as 1997. Kotz told the Senate Banking Committee that Spencer Barasch, the SEC's former head of enforcement at Fort Worth, successfully quashed probes into Stanford's company several times, and then tried to represent the financier after leaving the SEC, reports the Financial Times. "Every lawyer in Texas and beyond is going to get rich over this case. OK? And I hated being on the sidelines,” Barasch said, according to Kotz's report.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Watchdog: SEC Sued Goldman to Bury Ponzi Probe is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 6 comments
Sep 24, 2010 4:00 AM CDT
SO, does this mean this country over regulates companies? Cough Mitt Romney cough.
Sep 23, 2010 11:23 PM CDT
Wall Street is a failure. Is the Dow going to go up up up forever and ever?
Sep 23, 2010 11:59 AM CDT
NO, NO, NO. The free markets know what's best. The are fully in tune with "the will of the American people". Whenever you hear a people use the phrase "the will of -BLANK-(God, the American people, etc.)" it should clue you in. They are trying to project the will of their special interests onto -BLANK-. And who here is shocked by this?