Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Did Bankers Go to Jail for Causing Great Depression?

No, although a couple were charged and some were embarrassed

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 30, 2011 2:40 PM CST

(Newser) – The government could soon prosecute a few Wall Streeters who allegedly played a role in the financial crisis, and the commission that uncovered those at fault was modeled on a similar probe after the Great Depression. So did anyone who precipitated that collapse ever go to jail? Nope, writes Brian Palmer in Slate’s Explainer column: “The rampant speculation and eventual crash of 1929 weren't caused by fraud or illegality, but by unreasonable optimism and loose financial regulation.”

Even so, the feds did bring charges against some of that era’s most aggressive bankers, like Samuel Insull, who cost his investors nearly $800 million, and Charles “Sunshine Charley” Mitchell, who pushed shady investments on customers. But thanks to the lack of pre-existing rules, Insull was acquitted and Mitchell got off with a fine. Others were simply embarrassed by the probe, like JP Morgan, who had to admit he hadn’t paid taxes for three years thanks to investment losses.

People walk out of the JP Morgan headquarters in New York City September 13, 2000.
People walk out of the JP Morgan headquarters in New York City September 13, 2000.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
49%
23%
11%
3%
13%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 6 comments
bewilderbeast
Jan 31, 2011 9:53 AM CST
Didn't know banksters could get embarrassed. Bare-faced thieves usually can't.
brawne
Jan 30, 2011 10:34 PM CST
Took four different prosecutors till they found one who understood what they did prior to '29. Took him five years to get some in jail. I don't care if they go to jail. I'd like for a Pecora to step forward and explain it all in a way that every American can understand. Cause it happened one way and it's one story and that's it--the facts. Right now you got conservatives blaming Freddie and liberals blaming deregulation and guys at Goldman blaming the ratings agency and two guys in Queens saying it was lazy bastards buying a house they couldn't afford. Who cares? It was all of that and more and until we truly understand it--it will happen again. It is a flaw in capitalism. Yes, it has a flaw and we should fix it. Communism had a flaw too and they knew it for twenty years before that Wall fell down. Capitalism can not survive when people who make nothing--no widget-- make a profit. Profit must come from work. You can not have a level of people who make more than the company that makes the widget betting on whether the widget gets made. No Wall Street. Can't have it doesn't work with free market capitalism. Football works without sports betting. Now--imagine if the sports betters got the profit from say, a third of the ticket buyers--think you'd have football? Wall Street does nothing but take bets on performance and it's a rich man's game. I read the coolest thing the other day--they only print the stock page with daily numbers for the stupid people to think they know something cause they read the index. You gotta hang by the barn to win a horse race and you gotta be on Wall Street to make money off stocks. No--not stocks--fucking boxing the trifecta. Know what Frank Costello said to a stock broker fifty years ago--he was a total gangster in gambling--he said my guys got a statistical chance. It's all statistics--blackjack is the only par with the house. Roulette--54% in favor of the house every single time. Wall Street--everything goes to the house. A sucker bet. Smart people screwing you. Didn't bother me either till they took a third of my high yield fund and got their money back and moi--didn't. I was the sucker as were all the school systems, pension funds, state funds--you ain't seen nothing yet. I can write a loss off my taxes. California can't.
boxcar
Jan 30, 2011 9:39 PM CST
Believe it or not the roots for the 1930s Great Depression originated with the onset of our Civil War over 3 generations earlier- In 1862 Congress passed [The Land Grant College Act of 1862] the purpose of which was to ensure The MECHANIZATION of AGRICULTURE by establishing A&M colleges in all new western states. Lincoln had been advised it would take over 1 BILLION SLAVES to do the Great Plains land mass, so the THRUST of his presidency was to ensure this would NOT BE. South decided to stick with investments in SLAVE LABOR so LIncoln ABOLISHED slavery in REBEL states ONLY to force the south to go along with game plan. Purpose of Civil War was to ensure the Mechanization of Agriculture would take hold in US, not "Free" ALL slaves- The 13th ammendment did that 2yrs later Similarly a Civil War over Land Reform was being fought in China- In 1862 over 20Million chinese died SLAVERY won out in China- Today we have 1 BILLION SLAVES in China- [made in China "by slaves"] Lincoln stood head n' shoulders above ANY president in his foresight into the 20th Century needs Origin of the Great Depression was the Civil War and its purpose of achieving Mechanized Agriculture GDI would have occured no matter WHO was manipulating the stock market or banking system- To wit: My mom (born 1909) told me she remembered cooking for a crew of 2 dozen men in 1920 when age 10 By the time she graduated from college, 1930, took half a dozen men to do her dad's mile section, so what happened to the other TWENTY? "Went to town to look for work- we called it Great Depression" "Teenagers walked the land w/a HOE to chop cotton for food- we called them HOE BOYS ever hear it? IF 3/4 of workforce has NO JOB, economy tanks, no matter who runs banking system- Mox Nix
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne