Dear Feds: Don't You Dare Let AT&T Buy T-Mobile

Say goodbye to competition, hello to gouging
By Nick McMaster,  Newser Staff
Posted Mar 21, 2011 7:13 PM CDT
In this July 19, 2010 file photo, the AT&T logo is displayed on the side of a corporate office in Springfield, Ill.   (AP Photo/Seth Perlman, File)

(Newser) – AT&T's bid to buy T-Mobile is brilliant, writes Brett Arends for MarketWatch—for AT&T. For everyone else, it's "disastrous," if not downright anticompetitive. "It will let AT&T shut down a competitor, jack up prices, and save on customer service," he writes in a bleak look at the proposed merger. A fourth player "helped keep the other three at least semi-honest. If you think they’re arrogant now, just wait till they’ve cut this cozy club down to three."

Seems Arends himself jumped ship from AT&T to T-Mobile just a few weeks ago. Why? "Simple. T-Mobile offered me a better deal." Those are the same T-Mobile perks that AT&T's chair says the company "will look hard" at. And Verizon and Sprint use the CDMA network, while T-Mobile and AT&T use GSM, so AT&T will now have a monopoly on GSM. If you doubt that AT&T is trying to game the system, Arends writes, consider that "the company spent $15 million lobbying in 2010 alone. The biggest beneficiary? House Speaker John Boehner. It employs 93 lobbyists. Seven more and it would have its own private Senate."

My Take on This Story
Show results without voting  |