Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

NATO Takes Over No-Fly Zone in Libya

But that's all for now

By the Associated Press

Posted Mar 24, 2011 4:57 PM CDT | Updated Mar 24, 2011 6:12 PM CDT

(AP) – After days of hard bargaining among its members, NATO agreed late today to enforce the no-fly zone over Libya—but not other military operations yet. The agreement, announced in Brussels by the alliance's secretary-general, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, will allow the United States to hand over command and control of part of the international operation, as it has been eager to do. But it appeared that some NATO members balked at supervising attacks on targets on the ground.

"At this moment there will still be a coalition operation and a NATO operation," Fogh Rasmussen said. "But we are considering whether NATO should take on the broader responsibility." Hillary Clinton said it was just a matter of time. She said the alliance eventually would protect Libyan civilians, enforce the UN arms embargo, and support humanitarian aid efforts. "All 28 allies have also now authorized military authorities to develop an operations plan for NATO to take on the broader civilian protection mission."

A Libyan rebel chants slogans as he takes part in a march to support the international coalition in Benghazi.
A Libyan rebel chants slogans as he takes part in a march to support the international coalition in Benghazi.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
5%
4%
70%
6%
10%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 17 comments
DontLikeYou
Mar 24, 2011 11:49 PM CDT
Humanitarian? Bah. Why are we not in Darfur? The West is lacking leadership. Our ship is drifting.
n230099
Mar 24, 2011 8:07 PM CDT
Yeah, that's brave. They announced the other day that the Libyan airforce is destroyed.
atbo
Mar 24, 2011 7:33 PM CDT
"But it appeared that some NATO members balked at supervising attacks on targets on the ground." Man this pisses me off. I don't think we should be in Libya, but the U.N. voted for the no-fly-zone. So we, America, go in, get the ball rolling and when it's time to hand it off, NATO doesn't want to do the dirty work. Ok I see, U.N. votes for it, but America, the hated one, has to provide the military force and get blamed for all the civilians that were accidentally injured or killed. FUCK THE UN AND NATO! They are a bunch of whimps. And let's not forget the cost of all this. I'm sure NATO is just fine with the fact that all that ordinance we're dropping on Libya costs us money and not them.

Copyright 2012 Newser, LLC. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. AP contributed to this report.

More Newser Stories

Can Gadhafi Outlast NATO?

US: Gadhafi Wants to Skip Town

House to Vote on Resolution to End Libya Mission

NATO Blames Target Flaw in New Civilian Strike

Gates: NATO Full of Freeloaders


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment