Fox Couldn't Control Glenn Beck Anymore
Both sides seem genuinely happy that it's over
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 6, 2011 7:44 PM CDT
A Feb. 20, 2010, file photo of Glenn Beck.   (AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana, File)

(Newser) – Plenty of speculation is out there about what finally caused Glenn Beck and Fox News to pull the plug on his show, but Glynnis MacNicol at Business Insider thinks it boils down to this: "Beck and Fox are parting ways because Beck had too much power and Fox couldn't control him." After all, other Fox broadcasters say offensive things, but "the difference is that should Fox want to rein them in they are generally able to do so," writes MacNicol. "Less so with Beck."

This feels like a genuinely mutual decision—Beck gets to go play in his burgeoning media empire, and Fox execs "no longer have to answer for someone who doesn't like to answer to them," writes MacNicol. At the Daily Beast, Howard Kurtz has similar take. He writes that senior Fox officials "are relieved to be rid of Beck" and that "Beck too, has tired of the friction" and is happy to be leaving. All in all, it's "a case study in how even the most successful broadcast personalities can become too hot to handle."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Fox Couldnt Control Glenn Beck Anymore is...
24%
23%
12%
6%
34%
2%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 41 comments
T-MAN
Apr 7, 2011 1:21 AM CDT
Faux can't control a crazy man. Who would have thought. Bye Bye cry baby Glenda.
saucier111
Apr 6, 2011 11:07 PM CDT
Glen Beck has ben making about 46,000,000 yeah thats millions of dollars a year for some time.With all that money could he begin to be his own man.
JackNelsonSteward
Apr 6, 2011 9:56 PM CDT
You don't think it could have anything to do with his sponsors (Read: $$$$$$ for Fox) fleeing in droves, huh?