Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Big Tobacco Beats Hospital Lawsuit

Landmark Missouri suit fails

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted Apr 30, 2011 7:30 AM CDT

(Newser) – It was a "case of David versus Goliath," as hospitals took on tobacco companies in Missouri, a hospital lawyer says—and Goliath won. A jury decided yesterday that tobacco companies aren't liable for money spent on patients with tobacco-related illnesses who can't pay their bills, reports the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. The $455 million lawsuit, filed on behalf of dozens of hospitals who treat many destitute, non-paying patients, had taken 13 years to come to trial.

The hospitals argued that cigarette makers had delivered an "unreasonably dangerous" product that left hospitals stuck with the cost of treating uninsured patients with smoking-related illnesses. "The jury here found that ordinary cigarettes are not defective and not negligently manufactured, and that's what this case was all about," a lawyer for Philip Morris says. Some 160 similar cases nationwide never made it as far as trial.

The verdict “shows common sense,” a Philip Morris lawyer said. “It shows that our product is not defective just because it contains nicotine.”
The verdict “shows common sense,” a Philip Morris lawyer said. “It shows that our product is not defective just because it contains nicotine.”   (AP Photo/Michael Probst)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

This proves again that the companies are enormously powerful. They're very well-lawyered. They're the best money can buy. They are going to win some. - Clifford Douglas, director of the University of Michigan Tobacco Research Network

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
11%
45%
30%
3%
7%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 17 comments
Rational.-Anarchist
Apr 30, 2011 8:49 PM CDT
As a former smoker for over 40 years,whose wife is a lung cancer survivor, I certainly don't defend tobacco use.However, NO ONE ever forced me to smoke, so I have to live with my choices & accept responsibility for them. I don't feel I have the right to sue the tobacco companies for my mistake, nor should any one else.
gomer99
Apr 30, 2011 8:10 PM CDT
" I made stupid decisions and now somebody should pay me for the suffering it caused " The jury said " Bullshit " Good job, jury.
boxcar
Apr 30, 2011 11:27 AM CDT
When Rachael Carson wrote "Silent Spring" in early 60s, her bibliography contained government studies on Big Tobacco's use of ARSENATE of LEAD as an insectocide for over 3 centuries, 1600s, 1700s & 1800s.There are entire COUNTIES saturated with this POISON in the Tobacco states- The ISSUE- what to do about thousands of acres saturated with this POISON unfit for human use? Answer- keep on growin' tobacci, it SUCKs the POISONS out of the land- who cares about smokers They're going to die of TAR & NICOTINE POISON anyway- Point is, its the Gov't's fault for NOT doing anything about subjecting the rest of us to 2nd hand UNFILTERED POISONOUS smoke particles- Oh, they've banned public smoking? How about banning public SALE of poisonous tobacci? Don't see RAT POISON for sale in grocery stores do you, but cigs is OK? What's up with that? Also, there were trace elements of POLONIUM 84 in the impure ARESENATE of LEAD used. The KGB used Po84 to kill spys with! Your radiologist can tell if you've inhaled tobacco smoke- Po84 "FOGS" his plates & LEAD obscures it But- here's one guy who was saved by TOBACCO- On my way to Viet Nam, US Army found out I was highly allergic to the ARSENIC in ALL American tobacco, unfit for military duty- saved my life because I was gung ho (my dad a 3-war vet) so I know I'd been "fragged" by my own troops as a 2nd Lt
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne