Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Mother's Day Wish: No More Needless Deaths

Modern contraceptives in poor nations can save thousands: Kristof

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted May 8, 2011 7:00 AM CDT

(Newser) – For Mother's Day, how about we do something to reduce the 350,000 deaths of mothers during childbirth each year, suggests Nicholas Kristof in the New York Times. Congress has the power to help, but it would involve one of the big Republican taboos—"family planning." He cites a UN estimate that 215 million women around the world have an "unmet need" for such planning, "meaning they don’t want to become pregnant but are not using effective contraception." Getting contraceptives to them would result in 94,000 fewer deaths from pregnancy complications and 25 million fewer abortions, according to one research institute. It also would help keep the world's soaring population in check.

Despite those positives, Republicans are seeking to slash international family planning support. Last month's budget deal called for a 5% cut, but conservatives are seeking much larger one in the future. Kristof contrasts these policies with the GOP's unconditional support for contraception for wild horses in the American West. "Maybe on Mother’s Day, we could acknowledge that family planning is just as essential for humans as for horses," he writes.

Getting modern contraceptives to third-world nations can save tens of thousands of women from dying from pregnancy complications.
Getting modern contraceptives to third-world nations can save tens of thousands of women from dying from pregnancy complications.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
2%
0%
86%
3%
9%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 4 comments
boxcar
May 8, 2011 1:04 PM CDT
The recurring socio-economic upheaval that occurs like CLOCKWORK every 3 generations (1860s, 1930s & NOW) could be mitigated by global family planning. BUT if we continue to reproduce like so many human- lemmings with multi-birth familys, it will lead us into recurring bouts with GENOCIDAL increase in DEATHs as our traditional FINAL SOLUTION, when a decrease in BIRTHs is a more logical choice, but since when did the human species ever use their branes to plan for the future? Didn't happen in last 2 centuries, so why would we ecpect any differecnt this time?
sallythedoctor
May 8, 2011 11:15 AM CDT
This is more than a war on women. It's a war on the poor. The men and, even more annoying, women (who are invariably self-righteous and who think their shit doesn't stink) trying to cut funding for these programs wouldn't suffer a single bit if they had an accidental pregnancy. They have plenty of money, a family support unit, and generally easy lives. Take Sarah Palin. Trig was an accident, and he has a serious debilitating illness. The Right praises her for not aborting, but her family was already rich as hell when this happened.
rturner
May 8, 2011 10:11 AM CDT
why can't the drug company's give back once in a while with all their billions of dollars the make every year?

More Newser Stories

As Economy Tanks, Women Flock to Clinics

Kate Beckinsale: I Want GOP in My ...

GOP Handing 2016 to Hillary

Reproductive Care Risk: Catholic Hospitals Growing

Family Planning Is Pro-Life


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment