Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Not Bank's Fault Hackers Stole $300K From Account

Customer should have done more to protect itself, judge rules

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 8, 2011 9:12 AM CDT

(Newser) – Hackers were able to steal more than $300,000 from a client’s Ocean Bank account, but according to a Maine judge’s ruling, the bank is not responsible. Though the judge acknowledged the bank didn’t follow “best” security practices, he ultimately ruled the customer should have done more to protect the account, Wired and BankInfoSecurity report. Hackers gained access to Patco Construction Company’s banking credentials by sending a malicious email to employees and subsequently installing a password-stealing Trojan.

When the thieves started siphoning about $100,000 a day from the account, Patco says alarms were raised at the bank—but the bank didn’t notice or heed them; instead of manually reviewing the red flags, the bank's system just asked challenge questions. The family-owned business didn’t realize the problem until nearly $600,000 in fraudulent transfers were allowed to go through. The bank was able to block $240,000 of the transfers; the company lost the rest of the money. Patco claimed the bank should have used multi-factor authentication, but the bank said it did enough by verifying an authentic ID and password. The judge agreed, noting that the bank is clear when customers sign up about how much security it provides and how much liability it assumes.

A judge ruled recently that a bank was not responsible for allowing fraudulent transfers that cost a customer more than $300,000.
A judge ruled recently that a bank was not responsible for allowing fraudulent transfers that cost a customer more than $300,000.   (Shutterstock)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
2%
2%
13%
3%
70%
11%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 2 of 3 comments
finkster
Jun 8, 2011 11:30 AM CDT
Could our judicial system be anymore f##ked up?!!!
passinthru1
Jun 8, 2011 9:41 AM CDT
I can't argue with the judge's decision here. The email didn't come from the bank.   It came from someone pretending to be the bank.   Anyone using email today should know that you never click on a link that comes in email.   Never.   It's the equivalent of some anonymous person coming to your door, claiming to be a bank official askng for your credentials. It is not up to the bank to protect the ignorant.    The ignorant should not be using computers.

More Newser Stories

Ex-Citigroup VP Charged With Embezzling $19.2M

Audits: Top Mortgage Firms Defrauded Taxpayers

Identify Theft Cases Spike, but Hackers Aren't to Blame

Stanford 'Fraud Scheme Sealed With Blood Oath'

Stanford Was a Drug Informant: Report


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment