Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

NASA Reveals Massive Mars Rocket Plans

New $35B project could launch up to 165 tons into space

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Sep 14, 2011 12:54 PM CDT

(Newser) – NASA today unveiled plans for a rocket that will power the next generation of space exploration, designed to take manned missions to distant asteroids and eventually Mars, Space.com reports. The uncreatively named “Space Launch System,” or SLS, uses bits of technology from the defunct space shuttle and Constellation projects, but actually bears a stronger resemblance to the old Apollo craft than the shuttle, the AP reports, since it uses a mix of liquid hydrogen and oxygen instead of a solid rocket booster.

Initially the rockets will be able to haul between 77 and 110 tons into space, including a six-person Orion vehicle—less than the 130 tons the Saturn V booster from the Apollo program could manage, but a far cry above the shuttle’s 27 ton capacity. NASA hopes to have its first test flight in the sky by 2017. The rocket has been embroiled in budget controversy, with reports putting its price tag as high as $65 billion, but officials say it will actually cost around $35 billion.

This NASA illustration shows the design for a new space rocket system, the Space Launch System.
This NASA illustration shows the design for a new space rocket system, the Space Launch System.   (Getty Images)
This NASA illustration shows the design for a new space rocket system, the Space Launch System.
This NASA illustration shows the design for a new space rocket system, the Space Launch System.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Check out another Brilliant story: It's About Time We Started Paying Interns
1%
Hilarious
14%
Intriguing
3%
Depressing
76%
Brilliant
2%
Scary
4%
Annoying
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 47 comments
DontLikeYou
Sep 15, 2011 10:27 AM CDT
The rocket has been embroiled in budget controversy, with reports putting its price tag as high as $65 billion, but officials say it will actually cost around $35 billion. Which means it will actually cost about $300 billion
HarryBeaver
Sep 14, 2011 4:47 PM CDT
The rover has been functioning for almost 8 years.  What can a person do that it can't?  Anyway, you could make the program a lot cheaper if you send suicidal midgets who don't want to return
BrushMan
Sep 14, 2011 4:36 PM CDT
What is on distant asteroids that we need to go there to see?  And what is the difference whether or not there is life on Mars? This baloney is nothing but job security for engineers and other government leeches. Same with the Space Station. There are lots of better ways of exploring space than sending humans. Way cheaper too.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne