Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Think You're Pretty Hot? You're Probably Wrong Study finds we have inflated vision of ourselves »

Goldman Posts $428M Loss

It's the second time it's ever lost money as a public company

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Oct 18, 2011 8:22 AM CDT

(Newser) – It was a bad three months to be a vampire squid: Goldman Sachs reported a $428 million third-quarter loss today, or 84 cents a share—far worse than the 16 cents per share that analysts were expecting, according to Reuters. The blow came largely thanks to $2.48 billion in negative revenue from its Investment & Lending division, which holds the companies stocks, bonds, and other long-term assets.

That includes a $1.05 billion loss from Goldman's private equity investment in the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the New York Times notes. The firm's trading revenue was down big as well. “Our results were significantly impacted by the environment, and we were disappointed to record a loss,” CEO Lloyd Blankfein said. It’s just the second time in Goldman’s history as a publicly-traded company that it’s recorded a quarterly loss. Overall, the company’s revenues were down 60% from a year earlier, and 51% from the second quarter.

In this June 29, 2011 photo, the headquarters building of Goldman Sachs in shown, in New York.
In this June 29, 2011 photo, the headquarters building of Goldman Sachs in shown, in New York.   (AP Photo/Richard Drew)
People arrive at Goldman Sachs headquarters, Tuesday, Oct.  18, 2011 in New York.
People arrive at Goldman Sachs headquarters, Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011 in New York.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
54%
4%
14%
19%
6%
3%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 16 comments
Watching4theMODS
Oct 19, 2011 11:15 AM CDT
I don't believe it. Sounds like some Hollywood accounting to me.
T-MAN
Oct 18, 2011 6:12 PM CDT
No more bail outs for the whores.
Non-deep-thinker
Oct 18, 2011 11:41 AM CDT
See?  You don't have to march around in circles and "camp out" under tarps to destroy the banks.  Let the Obama economy work its magic and it'll take them down just like everything else. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- By the way... I thought Wall St was "occupied". How are they even able to function?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne