Follow Newser on Twitter   Friend Newser on Facebook
Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Got a Tech Hunch? Use 'Milkshake Test'

Thought exercise helps predict a new technology's popularity

By Matt Cantor,  Newser Staff

Posted Nov 8, 2011 7:00 PM CST

(Newser) – Five years ago, everyone was ready for a Second Life revolution—but the virtual world has largely fizzled. Google and iPods, on the other hand, have lived up to the hype. How do we know when to believe in lofty tech expectations? At Slate, Dan and Chip Heath propose a thought experiment adapted from writer Clay Christensen. Pretend marketers learn that milkshakes sell best to early-morning commuters. The commuters are, in effect, hiring those shakes to do a specific job—providing a quick and easy breakfast.

In order to sell more milkshakes, then, marketers don't need to worry about things like improving flavor. They might instead speed up service, anything to make a shake be a more "useful 'employee,'" they write. "So when you evaluate the next big thing, ask the Christensen question: What job is it designed to do?" We hired Google for great searches and iPods for portable music. But Second Life “was like a job candidate with a fascinating résumé—fluent in Finnish, with stints in spelunking and trapeze—but no actual labor skills,” the Heaths write. Click through for the full article.

The iPod has been a great employee.
The iPod has been a great employee.   (AP Photo/Julie Jacobson, file)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
27%
1%
46%
0%
21%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
A snapshot of the day's best news stories.
 
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
gaberoonie
Nov 25, 2011 8:41 AM CST
Correct link to the slam-dunk rebuttal that demolishes the pathetic "milkshake test": http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2011/11/the-myth-of-why-second-life-failed-to-go-big.html
gaberoonie
Nov 25, 2011 3:49 AM CST
The Heaths really blew it with this failed analysis. The most powerful rebuttal to this nonsense is here: http://nwn.blogs.com/nwn/2011/11/the-myth-of-why-s...    I'm one of thousands of artists that make more than decent money with Second Life development and content creation. The platform will be around for years, maybe decades to come. It's been profitable for Linden Labs and the benefits for SL's million-strong userbase are limitless.     LL has made mistakes for sure. The platform has flaws. Many of these mistakes were fatal, scaring away millions more users that SL could have had otherwise. But the diagnosis of failure is erroneous, and the analysis in this article is laughable.
baranoww
Nov 10, 2011 2:37 PM CST
I was just going to read the rest of the article. Then, I saw it was from Slate. No thanks.

More Newser Stories

Insurer Opens (Virtual) Island Getaway

Hewlett-Packard to Cut 27K Jobs

GM Won't Buy Ads in Next Super Bowl

Apple Beats Expectations Again, Sells 35M iPhones

Quiet Startup Might Change Business of Online Video


NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   Geek Sugar   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment