Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Hot on Facebook
Man Butt-Dials 911 While Discussing Murder Plans Floridian is charged after slaying »

Brown, Warren Make Pact to Boot Super PACs

But will it work?

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jan 24, 2012 7:34 AM CST

(Newser) – Scott Brown and Elizabeth Warren are rivals in a sure-to-be-bitterly-contested race for Ted Kennedy's old Senate seat, but they both want super PACs to stay out of it: The rivals yesterday entered into a pact discouraging outside groups from airing ads on their behalf; both Brown and Warren agreed to pay 50% of the ads' cost to a charity chosen by their rival if any such ads do air, CBS News reports.

In a statement, Brown called the pact "a great victory for the people of Massachusetts, and a bold statement that puts super PACs and other third parties on notice that their interference in this race will not be tolerated." But Time notes that the agreement may not work, particularly because super PACs may be able to skirt it by airing "issue ads" rather than "candidate ads." The line between the two types is blurry, since issue ads still target candidates on their policy positions. It's also possible that super PACs will simply spend more on other types of campaigning, including phone banking and direct mail.

Elizabeth Warren speaks in Lowell, Mass. Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011 during a debate between six Massachusetts Democratic candidates for the US Senate seat held by Republican Scott Brown.
Elizabeth Warren speaks in Lowell, Mass. Tuesday, Oct. 4, 2011 during a debate between six Massachusetts Democratic candidates for the US Senate seat held by Republican Scott Brown.   (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
In this Jan. 11, 2011 file photo, Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. is interviewed by The Associated Press interview at his office in Boston.
In this Jan. 11, 2011 file photo, Sen. Scott Brown, R-Mass. is interviewed by The Associated Press interview at his office in Boston.   (AP Photo/Josh Reynolds, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
1%
6%
1%
89%
0%
3%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 8 comments
LoginsSuck
Jan 24, 2012 10:51 AM CST
Now that Colbert has shined a light on the joke of how our election system works with respect to Super PACs, all of a sudden politicians are running from and distancing themselves. Why do I get the feeling they are not sorry, just sorry America has found out and will be looking for another way around the system that is not publicly known?
RogerMohajir
Jan 24, 2012 10:24 AM CST
I admire their good intentions nine months out, but politics is warfare and if you believe that your side must prevail or the republic will suffer (as anyone with the temerity to run for US Senate must), then you don't leave any weapons unused when defeat is staring you in the face. They'll keep to their agreement, as long as the polls are showing a tight race. If one of them opens up a substantial lead, though, they'll reach for the black briefcase and go nuclear.
crafter67
Jan 24, 2012 9:11 AM CST
"super PACs may be able to skirt it by airing "issue ads" rather than "candidate ads." GREAT!!! - The issues SHOULD be the main focus of the campaign - Good for BOTH of them!  
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne