Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

EPA Budget Cuts Could Imperil ... Beachgoers?

It plans to kill $10M in grants used to test tainted water

By Kate Seamons,  Newser Staff

Posted Feb 16, 2012 10:59 AM CST

(Newser) – Swimmers, beware: You may want to stick with sand, not surf, this summer. The EPA is feeling the financial squeeze, and this week submitted a budget request that eliminates $10 million in grants that are used to test for polluted water and post warning signs. The EPA says the burden can just shift to the former beneficiaries: coastal and Great Lakes states, which have "the technical expertise and procedures to continue beach monitoring without federal support." But the Los Angeles Times says that certainly isn't the case in California, which has had a hard time footing the bill even with federal funding.

And an LA environmental group's water quality director says this year could actually feel "like a double whammy to beachgoers." That's because the EPA isn't just planning to cut funds—it's also working on creating weaker US beach water quality standards. What woes can befall swimmers who take a dip in tainted water, thereby exposing themselves to pathogens? Fun things like diarrhea, vomiting, skin rashes, and ear, eye, and staph infections.

Signs warn the public to stay out of the water in an area harboring high bacteria levels near a drain at Will Rogers State Beach on August 7, 2007 in Pacific Palisades, northwest of Los Angeles.
Signs warn the public to stay out of the water in an area harboring high bacteria levels near a drain at Will Rogers State Beach on August 7, 2007 in Pacific Palisades, northwest of Los Angeles.   (Getty Images)
Vacationers spend time at the shore in Kure Beach, North Carolina.
Vacationers spend time at the shore in Kure Beach, North Carolina.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
7%
2%
62%
9%
12%
9%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 9 comments
finkster
Feb 16, 2012 1:18 PM CST
If man stopped throwing every chemical concoction they create and radiated material into the ocean  This wouldn't be a problem.
serfinWI
Feb 16, 2012 12:05 PM CST
California is broke.  It'll have trouble footing the bill for anything without help from US taxpayers.  It's about time the cord is cut.  Maybe then they'll figure out their priorities.
ddhartma
Feb 16, 2012 11:35 AM CST
Maybe Ron Paul is right. Maybe the EPA is a waste of our money. Even they believe that the states should have the authority and power to control their waters.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne