Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Murkowski Regrets Vote on Birth Control

Alaska senator rethinks support of Blunt amendment

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 6, 2012 1:44 PM CST

(Newser) – Lisa Murkowski says she's had a change of heart on the Blunt amendment, and would vote against it if given a second chance. The Alaska Republican has taken heat from moderate women back home for supporting the amendment, which would have allowed employers to opt out of any health care mandate they morally objected to, she tells the Anchorage Daily News.

"I have never had a vote I've taken where I have felt that I let down more people that believed in me" until now, she says. While she'd intended to cast a vote for religious freedom, she said voters had seen it as a vote against contraceptive coverage. Asked if she'd vote for it again, she replied, "No." She added that Blunt had always been a "messaging amendment," meaning one that "both sides know is not going to pass."

Lisa Murkowski is seen during a news conference in this November 30, 2011, file photo.
Lisa Murkowski is seen during a news conference in this November 30, 2011, file photo.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
20%
7%
6%
13%
3%
50%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 33 comments
Hambone4x
Mar 6, 2012 9:48 PM CST
Shouldn't these people find out what their constituents want BEFORE voting? 
plain_speaking
Mar 6, 2012 4:42 PM CST
How about voting correctly in the first place...instead of bowing to the GOP that has been hijacked by extremist....get control of your party....the lunatics are in charge....
professortech
Mar 6, 2012 3:59 PM CST
Murkowski "I voted that way because everyone knows it was just a 'messaging' amendment that wasn't going to pass anyway." There is the crux of our present national problem - our politicians waste time, money, effort and resources proposing "political" legislation that is not meant to pass but is just meant to send a message to some constituancy or the other, so that the politicians can be assured of donations and re-election. This engrains the idea/behavior that no one has to actually compromise to pass legitimate legislation that adresses the problem, they just need to do political posturing that avoids solutions and political repercussions.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne