Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

To Drill or Not to Drill

Krauthammer: Obama 'fatuous'; Krugman: GOP 'intellectually bankrupt'

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Mar 16, 2012 10:45 AM CDT

(Newser) – The US president may not directly control gas prices, but Barack Obama's "disdain" for oil is still hurting Americans terribly, writes Charles Krauthammer in the Washington Post. Restricting drilling, vetoing the Keystone pipeline, and similar anti-oil moves are killing thousands of local jobs, hurting relations with Canada, and sending billions of dollars to Venezuela, Russia, and Saudi Arabia. Trying to develop alternative fuels of the future is a waste of time and resources. "Drilling is the single most important thing we can do to spur growth at home while strengthening our hand abroad," writes Krauthammer. High gas prices are "a constant reminder of three years of a rigid, fatuous, fantasy-driven energy policy that has rendered us scandalously dependent and excessively vulnerable." Full column here.

But calls for more drilling are just "intellectual bankruptcy," argues Paul Krugman in the New York Times. America is already in a "hydrocarbon boom," with oil and natural gas production on the rise, but that has not stopped oil prices from soaring. That's because increasing demand from developing countries and Mideast war worries "easily outweigh any downward pressure on prices from rising US production." The hydrocarbon boom has also had little effect on jobs—the 70,000 jobs gained since the middle of the last decade represent just .05% of total US employment. So why the GOP focus on fossil fuels? One, the oil and gas lobby. And, two, conservatives have no other ideas. "And intellectual bankruptcy, I’m sorry to say, is a problem that no amount of drilling and fracking can solve." Full column here.

This photo takeen Jan. 18, 2012, shows four oil pumps near a subdivision near Frederick, Colo.
This photo takeen Jan. 18, 2012, shows four oil pumps near a subdivision near Frederick, Colo.   (AP Photo/Ed Andrieski)
An oil pump works at sunset in the desert oil fields of Sakhir, Bahrain, in the Persian Gulf.
An oil pump works at sunset in the desert oil fields of Sakhir, Bahrain, in the Persian Gulf.   (AP Photo/Hasan Jamali)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
3%
12%
4%
34%
4%
43%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 56 comments
Cat-Lover
Mar 17, 2012 9:12 PM CDT
Fareed Zakaria said it best on a recent CNN interview:  If the GOP candidates would stop calling for attacks against Iran and acknowledge that newly emerging economies were demanding more and more oil, prices would go down.  The real problem, as Krugman highlights, is that we can't see alternative energy as a viable source and when one investment in solar energy failed, the GOP said, "...told you so."  Well, how will we reduce dependence on oil if we don't try and don't invest in alternatives?
boxcar
Mar 16, 2012 10:32 PM CDT
Obama is reluctant to even MENTION the best solution for energy- NUCLEAR POWER Can you guess why? Japan's nuclear power problem has given it a black eye, he would lose votes Scientific American generated a total global picture of ENERGY usage back in the 1970s They had a historical graph showing energy use over the mileniums, where 10,000 years ago up until start of industrial age we burned WOOD and HAY(for horse transport) then gradually switched to COAL when England ran out of forest wood, then went into OIL for most of 20th Century, but then showed projection of a gradual shift into NUCLEAR energy for 21st Century. What they didn't figure on was GREED of powers that be to keep us using OIL in 21st Century Can you guess why Warren Buffet bought a railroad- they ship COAL AND Chinese products by rail Just like can you guess why we fought Viet Nam? Ever hear of Michellin Tire Corp rubber tree plantations? When JFK was shot fall of 1963, I took a job at RocketDyne in CA and saw a projection chart of how big the market was going to be for their solid rocket missile production in near future when Viet Nam ramped up In American business, its all about how to make a buck, no matter who gets in the way- sorry about that
boxcar
Mar 16, 2012 10:16 PM CDT
In 1960 as an Okla.Univ. student I received a questionaire from a state senator in re' Domestic vs Foreign OIL Question was does US invest capital in development of Domestic OIL, or do we invest it in Foreign OIL? Long answer was- Burn up all the Foreign OIL while its cheap and can be shipped across the pond in Super Tankers we'll have to build, leave US OIL in the ground- its "money in the bank" for future generations. Well here we are and its still "Money in the Bank". We know where it all is- When USSR invaded AFGHAN in 1980 we embarked on an oil well drilling spree (oil rig welders worked 24/7 in Tulsa, OK in 1981-83) where we ALREADY DRILLED ALL the wells and CAPPED them, waiting to see what happened in AFGHAN Well, we're about there when its time to switch from Foreign Oil to Domestic Oil, so whats the big deal? Its still all about who controls the OIL, and Domestic Oil threatens to undermine Foreign OIL The real reason Obama is holding up on the trans continent oil pipeline is its routed thru Cushing, OK where Domestic OIL tycoons will gain control while Obama's ruler George Soros is still developing Foreign Brazil OIL and don't want the competition of dealing with Domestic OIL suppliers Remember, its where the CAPITAL goes- Is it SuperTankers/Offshore Oil Rigs or Domestic PipeLines?
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne