It's Time to End the 60-Hour Workweek
40 hours provides maximum productivity: Geoffrey James
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Apr 30, 2012 8:07 AM CDT
Updated May 5, 2012 11:20 AM CDT
Working more than 40 hours a week may actually make us less productive.   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – Putting in a 60-hour workweek may look impressive—but it's probably not helping the company, or you. Plenty of studies back this up, writes Geoffrey James at Time, who points to a turn-of-the-20th-century analysis by Ford Motor Company that concluded the most productive number of weekly hours for workers was 40. Another 20 hours briefly increased productivity, but after just three to four weeks, it actually made workers less productive. The same is true of extended workweeks today, writes James.

"In every case I’ve observed, the long hours result in work that must be scrapped or redone," he notes. As for the fabled competitive edge that overworked countries have, he points out that six of the world's top 10 most competitive countries ban employers from requiring more than 48 hours a week from workers. It's time we started thinking like this, too—and if you need more convincing, consider the fact that Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg leaves work at 5:30 everyday.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
It's Time to End the 60-Hour Workweek is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 26 comments
May 6, 2012 2:05 AM CDT
just as Charlotte answered I'm dazzled that you can earn $7930 in 4 weeks on the internet. did you read this page
May 5, 2012 6:52 PM CDT
That's right, people. It's "brilliant" to stop working hard. Just like Greece. fucking idiots.
May 5, 2012 1:01 PM CDT
Just wait til the Wingnuts get power a 75 hr. work week won't be far behind (NO overtime). But first they have to repeal the Min. wage to $5 an hr. and roll back the child labor laws so the whole family can work to live week to week!