Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

US Military Class Suggested 'Hiroshima' Answer to Islam

Officers told total war on religion may be necessary

By Rob Quinn,  Newser Staff

Posted May 11, 2012 3:30 AM CDT | Updated May 11, 2012 3:47 AM CDT

(Newser) – A course for American military officers took a position on Islam so extreme that it sounds like the invention of al-Qaeda propagandists. Future military leaders were taught that to protect America, "total war" on all the world's Muslims may be necessary, and holy cities like Mecca may have to be obliterated like Hiroshima, targeting the "civilian population wherever necessary," Wired reports. The Pentagon suspended the course after a student objected to the material, but the lecturer, Army Lt. Col. Matthew Dooley, has kept his position at the Defense Department’s Joint Forces Staff College pending an investigation.

"We have now come to understand that there is no such thing as ‘moderate Islam,’” Dooley said in a presentation last year. "It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change, or we will facilitate its self-destruction." Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey has ordered all service branches to review training to make sure there is no similar anti-Islamic material, AP reports. The Joint Forces material was counter to American "appreciation for religious freedom and cultural awareness," he says. "It was just totally objectionable, against our values."

Dooley's war plan included outcomes like Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation, Islam reduced to cult status, and the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia destroyed.
Dooley's war plan included outcomes like "Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation," "Islam reduced to cult status," and the Muslim holy cities of Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia "destroyed."   (AP Photo/Hassan Ammar)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Check out another Brilliant story: Double Amputee Conquers Everest— Without...
4%
Hilarious
3%
Intriguing
7%
Depressing
40%
Brilliant
44%
Scary
3%
Annoying
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 76 comments
USLady
May 12, 2012 6:24 AM CDT
Protect America! Keep terrorists out.The thing is with many of these muslim people, they are always running their mouth about killing Americans,making threats against us and burning our flags.Being pushy,yelling in our streets threats,building Mosques where they bombed us! and on and on! And when we stand up for our country an people we are looked at as the ones that are wrong! how twisted! What do you think those type of people would have done if Americans did them the way they have did us! And that is another thing am sick of Obama working with them and both of them trying use fear tactics against Americans -even some commercials on TV now,which are put out by Obama's administration are to try to create fear in people! you know the end of America garbage! call now stuff! a bunch of Obama white house trash!
gridman07
May 12, 2012 5:38 AM CDT
It's funny to me to come here and expect to read intelligent blogs only to find pages of people who hate christians and think they themselves as wiser and holier than the people they hate. Those of you who hate the bible and christians remember that the bible spoke of you doing what you are doing today thousands of years ago. Odd how the SKY FARIE seemed to know how people would react in modern times. Even odder that it was right as it has been all along.
ladyrosedeky
May 12, 2012 12:58 AM CDT
And if Newt would have become president he would  have gone nuclear in the Middle-East. However, I'm very concerned over the way the Republican Party has been rattling their war sabers. They have been hurting the administration's and our allies' efforts of containment through sanctions. With the Lybian oil being back on-line and H.R. 1038 in the pipeline ready to pass, as far as our supply, we don't need the oil that comes through the Straight of Hormuz. Plus Obama has been working on getting what little oil we might need until our commercial industry gets transferred over enough to natural gas to eliminate our foreign import needs from Brazil. That leaves Europe that Russia has guaranteed their supply needs if Iran closes the straight. So then, that leaves the developing African countries. If Northern Sudan would cut the crap out and reopen the pipeline, well China would get most of the oil but part could go to the deloping countries in Africa which China has vested interest in. Once we get transferred over to natural gas in our commercial industry, which will happen pretty quickly because many are already starting even without H.R. 1038, we can help supply those countries. Then there is why aren't American companies, like the Koch's going to the Phillipines to negotiate for their oil rights instead of wanting to wage a war with Iran? This would keep China from infringing and threatening the Phillipine soveriegn waterways which they have been doing to access their oil.  It would also save America at least $1.5 trillion in cost of waging a war against Iran. Plus it would save thousands of American lives. Cost to build one deep sea oil rig is $700 million per Transocean's figures. All these actions not going to war with Iran would show Iran exactly how insignificant they really are. The main people who will be hurt by the closing of the straight with these actions would be Iraq, Iran, and the Saudis. Iran needs to not only export their own oil but Iraq's too. This would make the closure of the straight a regional issue. Let the Arab League handle Iran. Do any of you know how old Iran's fighter jets are versus Saudi Arabia's and Bahrain's? Iran has F-6 and F-7s. Bahrain and the Saudis, F-16s. Iran is totally outclassed.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne