Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

New York City's Neglected Killers: Trees

'Times' reveals overstretched, dangerous system of risk management

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted May 14, 2012 1:17 PM CDT

(Newser) – Over the past decade, at least 10 lawsuits have been filed over deaths or injuries from falling tree limbs or branches in New York City, a disturbing problem kept rather quiet by the city. In an extensive piece on the subject—the first in a series of three—the New York Times takes a look at a few of the horrifying cases and discovers that park workers are often not trained to spot telltale signs of rotting trees, and that the parks department has not kept up with the science of managing aging trees. Sometimes ailing trees are not dealt with even after limbs start falling off—and the problem comes to light at a time when the city is cutting back on the budget for tree care and safety.

When it comes to the question of whether the city is responsible for keeping pedestrians safe from trees, the courts have in many cases sided with the victims: New York City has paid out millions so far, and is expected to pay more. More findings from lawyers and investigators involved with the lawsuits, revealed by the Times:

  • In one case, a dangerous limb had been spotted and a park official believed workers “got” it taken care of, but in reality they had only “got” an email notifying them of the limb. It later critically injured a man. Workers never got around to dealing with the limb, but they did have time to prepare trees for the Macy’s Thanksgiving Day Parade.
  • In a few cases, workers have allegedly failed to notice clear risk signs; in one situation, a tree that seriously injured a woman was so rotted that its trunk was “gooey,” but workers hadn’t noticed.
  • Trees on city streets are only pruned every 15 years; they used to be pruned every seven years. And inspections of park trees are far from thorough, basically involving untrained employees simply peering up to spot obviously risky limbs. “It is a visual look from the ground,” says one worker. Another parks superviser testified that trees are only inspected when complaints come in.
Click for the full article.

An employee of the Central Park Conservancy marks off an area of downed branches in Central Park in New York, Monday, Oct. 31, 2011.
An employee of the Central Park Conservancy marks off an area of downed branches in Central Park in New York, Monday, Oct. 31, 2011.   (AP Photo/Seth Wenig)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
5%
10%
19%
3%
42%
20%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 11 comments
Eat_Eateator
May 15, 2012 1:32 PM CDT
I just think it's pathetic that a "World Class City" like New York can't take care of it's trees. Really need to focus on being smart and cool as a commodity. And yes it costs money to be smart and cool you fucking budget cutters.
FactsAreFacts
May 14, 2012 3:47 PM CDT
Trees give us OXYGEN, we need them, We ALSO need government to do it's job (to serve us) and to do that they need to quit wasting money and quit giving tax breaks to the rich and to corporations. There is no reason to neglect any maintenance (roads or trees or anything else) if government was run properly, but the short sightedness, cronyism and corruption causes the problems and then people argue and lose track of the problem in the first place. Government ineptitude and greed.
dilts2
May 14, 2012 1:46 PM CDT
Raise there taxes and cut down all the trees. If people want to complain and bitch then give them what they want. 
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne