Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Let's Require People to Vote

It 'would make our democracy work better,' says Peter Orszag

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jun 20, 2012 1:53 PM CDT

(Newser) – Because of our low voter participation rates, it's likely that no US president has actually been elected by a majority of adult Americans, writes former budget director Peter Orszag at Bloomberg. We can fix that by making voting mandatory, as it is in Australia and more than two dozen other countries. In Australia, compulsory voting caused participation to jump from 59% in 1922 to 91% in 1925; those who don't vote under such laws are fined. Not only would participation increase, but the effect of "big-money groups" and negative ads would be diminished, and polarization would likely decrease as well.

Political scientists disagree on exactly how mandatory voting would impact the US political landscape, but one thing is clear: In order to appease both Democrats and Republicans, "it could be instituted only when it would not be of obvious benefit to one political party over another." In other words, "when it would have almost no effect." So why bother? "Increased participation would make our democracy work better, in the sense of being more reflective of the population at large," Orszag concludes. "And it could allow the first president in history to be elected by a majority of American adults." Full column here.

Voters sign in and cast ballots in Philadelphia.
Voters sign in and cast ballots in Philadelphia.   (Getty Images)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
Check out another Brilliant story: It's About Time We Started Paying Interns
1%
Hilarious
5%
Intriguing
1%
Depressing
63%
Brilliant
11%
Scary
17%
Annoying
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 112 comments
TheVEG
Jun 21, 2012 12:40 PM CDT
I can just see the Super PACs, big money, negative ads, etc..., increasing 100fold if mandatory voting is implemented.  Right now they only have to target a percentage of voters in denser areas.  But with mandatory voting they would literally have to hit every single megalopolis, metropolis, city, town, village, etc... to convince all the voters to vote their way.  If anything...just to make sure the "stupid/uninformed" voters don't "waste" their vote on "the enemy/the other side".
tangeri
Jun 21, 2012 8:20 AM CDT
The problem would be convincing the Republicans, because this would always favor the Democrats.
piankeshaw
Jun 21, 2012 7:18 AM CDT
Peter Orszag must not be out among the masses much.  There are a lot of very stupid people out there.  I don't find it surprising any more when people cannot name the current president or articulate any of the current issues.  If we had mandatory voting many people would randomly select candidates. 
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne