Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Judge to Twitter: Turn Over Writer's Protest Tweets

Malcolm Harris' tweets not protected speech, judge rules

By Mary Papenfuss,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 3, 2012 2:26 AM CDT | Updated Jul 3, 2012 4:00 AM CDT

(Newser) – Freewheeling speech on Twitter isn't the same as protected speech, a judge has ruled. In a decision with major repercussions for social media communication, a Manhattan criminal court judge has ordered Twitter to turn over tweets sent by a New York writer during Occupy Wall Street protests last fall. Judge Matthew Sciarrino said that while private speech is protected, the writer's communication doesn't merit the same treatment because his tweets were public, reports the New York Times. The case involves writer Malcolm Harris, who was busted while Occupiers marched across the Brooklyn Bridge. Prosecutors demanded two days of Harris' tweets in a bid to contradict his expected defense that it was police who led protesters off the bridge walkway and into the road.

Twitter fought the request, and the ACLU filed a friend-of-the-court brief arguing that prosecutors should be required to obtain a search warrant in such a case, and that the process shouldn't skip over the writer of a tweet to go directly to Twitter. While the prosecution was delighted with the ruling, a Twitter statement expressed "disappointment," adding: "Twitter’s terms of service make it absolutely clear that its users own their content. We continue to have a steadfast commitment to our users and their rights." That's a surprise, given that Twitter itself has just revealed that it complied with 63% of 849 requests from law enforcement authorities to turn over tweets in the first six months of this year, reports the Los Angeles Times. American law enforcement made up 80% of those requests.

A line of cops block protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge during a march by Occupy Wall Street late last year.
A line of cops block protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge during a march by Occupy Wall Street late last year.   (AP Photo/Will Stevens, File)
Police begin to bust some 700 protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge during a march by Occupy Wall Street last fall.
Police begin to bust some 700 protesters on the Brooklyn Bridge during a march by Occupy Wall Street last fall.   (AP Photo/Stephanie Keith, File)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow

The Constitution gives you the right to post, but ... there are still consequences for your public posts. What you give to the public belongs to the public. What you keep to yourself belongs only to you. - Judge Matthew Sciarrino

« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
2%
13%
7%
20%
55%
4%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
Scaramouche
Jul 3, 2012 3:37 AM CDT
Twice now, I've read articles that seemed not to understand the point this judge was making. You can't say something in public, essentially yelling it across the Internet via Twitter, and then claim later that it was meant to be private. It's the same as if my wife and I had raunchy, dirty, sex while screaming vivid-details into megaphones with our windows open at 9:00 AM on a Sunday. We couldn't honestly claim it was a private act when the cops showed up. BTW, in making that judgment, the judge set a precedent in favor of the legality of file-sharing. Go figure.
Cheshire
Jul 3, 2012 2:55 AM CDT
“What you give to the public belongs to the public. What you keep to yourself belongs only to you.” And there are still those, who claim we are NOT living in Orwellian times. Amazing.
Nimitz
Jul 3, 2012 2:40 AM CDT
Free speech is anything but.  Learn well now and avoid the price later. . . . . .Oops! It's too late. 'Later' is already here.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   World History Project   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne