Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Joe Paterno Was a Selfish Liar

Sally Jenkins says the football coach cared more about his legacy than kids

By Kevin Spak,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 13, 2012 1:44 PM CDT

(Newser) – There's no longer any room for doubt: "Joe Paterno was a liar," writes Sally Jenkins of the Washington Post, who was the last to interview Paterno before his death. How, she had asked, could he not have known about the 1998 grand jury investigation into Sandusky? "Nobody knew," he said. "I never heard a thing." But everybody knew, and Paterno heard everything, according to the Freeh Report, and it has emails to back up its case.

The report does say that Paterno genuinely believed there was no evidence of a crime, and he "can be forgiven for … refusing to believe his colleague was a child molester in '98," Jenkins writes. "What's not forgivable is his sustained determination to lie from 2001 onward." Paterno even perjured himself before a grand jury. There's only one explanation: "He was more interested in protecting a cardboard cutout legacy than the flesh and blood of young men."

A statue of Joe Paterno is seen outside Beaver Stadium in State College, Pa., July 12, 2012.
A statue of Joe Paterno is seen outside Beaver Stadium in State College, Pa., July 12, 2012.   (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
2%
3%
18%
65%
2%
9%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 17 comments
Mudcat
Jul 14, 2012 2:42 PM CDT
Flag ... "illegal use of partial truths" Flag ... "illegal procedure of use of statements from Curley to say that there are emails to back it up" Flag ... "Piling on" Three administrators including the head of the campus police don't do their job.  No one says that Paterno knew or did not know of the 1998 rape, but Curley said that Paterno was "anxious about it" in an email when the administrative committee was looking into it, and finding there that it was "not worthy of proceeding, certainly nothing criminal".  Sandusky was not an employee of Paterno's after 1999 and the Administration issued, as part of Sandusky's retirement, a permit to use the facilities for Sandusky's charity.  The abuses took place on the football complex campus, but was not part of Paterno's charge. We all can agree, including Paterno himself, that he "coulda-shoulda" done more, and former coach Bowden is correct, the statue of Paterno now only serves as a reminder of this terrible atrocity, but throwing Paterno in with the Administrators after he thought he had taken it to people whose professional job was to handle such things, is but "piling on".  Paterno deserves derision, but not like the twit that wrote this does here ... no such evidence of such in the Freeh report. Child abuse is so terrible, so repugnant, that everyone wants to cast the widest net, and seek justice and revenge in such an intense way, that the facts get lost.  Freeh's final analysis was that Paterno was culpable, not because of what he DID do, nor because of what he DID NOT DO, but because he had stature on the campus, and at least a tertiary knowledge of the incidents, that HE COULD HAVE stopped it forthright, unlike almost any other coach at any other school ... he was that legendary, but did not use his power or stature to make sure the most vulnerable were protected, be they under his charge or not. The rest of this article is but emotional shrill.
Tology
Jul 14, 2012 2:20 PM CDT
They should do the same to Joe's statue as they did to Saddam Husseins, throw a rope around it and pull it down!
coreypaul
Jul 14, 2012 10:45 AM CDT
"Sally Jenkins says the football coach cared more about his legacy than kids"  um, yeah.....thats what normally is called reality
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne