Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

1st HIV-Prevention Pill Gets OK—But It's Complicated

Truvada promising, but some worry it won't be taken correctly

By Evann Gastaldo,  Newser Staff

Posted Jul 17, 2012 7:11 AM CDT

(Newser) – A big milestone came in the fight against AIDS yesterday, when the FDA approved the first drug meant for HIV prevention—but there are quite a few issues to consider. Truvada, which has been on the market for years as a means of treating those who already have the virus, can now be marketed as a preventative drug as well. It's been shown to be highly effective—it can lower a person's chances of getting HIV by 90% if taken correctly, NPR reports—but it must be taken every day, and some experts worry patients won't use it correctly, the AP notes.

Others worry that people on Truvada will stop taking other preventative measures—such as limiting sexual partners and using condoms, the most reliable way to guard against HIV infection. The drug is most effective for people at high risk (like an HIV-negative person in a relationship with an HIV-positive partner) who take it consistently, and it must be coupled with regular HIV tests, counseling, and other preventative measures. "It's not just, 'Here's a pill, take it, and you're rendered protected," says a researcher. Another concern: Truvada, which costs almost $14,000 a year, may not be accessible to one of the highest-risk groups—people without health insurance.

In this Thursday, May 10, 2012 photo, Dr. Lisa Sterman holds up a Truvada pill at her office in San Francisco.
In this Thursday, May 10, 2012 photo, Dr. Lisa Sterman holds up a Truvada pill at her office in San Francisco.   (AP Photo/Jeff Chiu)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
2%
69%
2%
20%
5%
3%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 7 comments
charlieb
Aug 23, 2012 12:33 PM CDT
Great.  Another reason for homosexuals (and heteros) not to use condoms.  The gay community in general doesn't take safe sex seriously enough because they "know they have drugs for AIDS."  I read that in a legit article, but I'm sorry I can't remember where.  So many don't care if they contract it.  But now If they know there could be a 90% chance of preventing it with a drug, why bother using an inexpensive condom?  This won't stop AIDS or other STDs from spreading. It's so simple. Use a condom. It's cheap, it unburdens society and yourself financially, no negative impact on health, and it will eventually eradicate the disease. But personal responsibility is too much to ask from people who would rather satisfy sexual urges than protect their health and others. I'm sure Obamacare will cover it, but if you're 70 with cancer, they'll just recommend assisted suicide.  (I'm not against assisted suicide, but I don't think that should be suggested as the first line of "treatment" just because you're old or disabled).  And how would any of us know?  The population isn't going to monitor millions of people's healthcare coverage, and you can't depend on the media to report the truth anymore.  Obamacare will just be veiled genocide and no one will know.  But I digress.
odowd80
Jul 17, 2012 9:56 AM CDT
$38 a day? Why even announce the drug? Who on earth is going to buy this?
midget_farmers
Jul 17, 2012 9:15 AM CDT
they can keep the poison... I will limit my sexual activity to safer sex.... just in case AIDS isn't a made up thing... 
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne