Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Feds Fume Over NY Attack on British Bank

Treasury Department, Fed pretty peeved over the move

By Mark Russell,  Newser Staff

Posted Aug 8, 2012 8:33 AM CDT

(Newser) – Standard Chartered wasn't the only one caught off-guard by Monday's accusations from the New York Department of Financial Services that the bank had gone "rogue" and helped Iran hide $250 million in transactions. The Treasury Department and Federal Reserve were just as stunned by the charges, along with the breadth of details released. And the Treasury says the move, of which it essentially had no advance warning, undermines its own talks with Standard Chartered about the transactions, reports Reuters. It also flies in the face of the usual approach to such cases: quiet negotiation, minimal public humiliation.

Standard Chartered said it has been talking with regulators for two years about the Iran issue, claiming the Iran transactions were "technical" mistakes and added up to less than $14 million. It notes that such matters are usually handled "through a coordinated approach by such agencies," so it was therefore blindsided by New York's move, "given that discussions with the agencies were ongoing." But with a staff of 1,500 and a budget of $235 million, the 18-month-old DFS and its aggressive boss Benjamin Lawsky could very well keep on rocking the financial industry, reports the New York Post. But feds worry Standard Chartered could paint DFS' claims as coming from an overly eager new regulator.

The head of the newly formed Department of Financial Services Benjamin Lawsky is behind the surprisingly aggressive allegations against Standard Chartered Bank.
The head of the newly formed Department of Financial Services Benjamin Lawsky is behind the surprisingly aggressive allegations against Standard Chartered Bank.   (wmhttv)
A man walks past the Standard Chartered bank building in Hong Kong yesterday.
A man walks past the Standard Chartered bank building in Hong Kong yesterday.   (AP Photo/Kin Cheung)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
13%
22%
3%
48%
6%
8%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 19 comments
shawnragan
Aug 9, 2012 5:46 AM CDT
The Feds were upset because it disrupted their "talks", so either they knew about the violations didn't care, or there were no real talks since they would have known about NY's investiagation   Either way, the Feds once again prove that you can double-talk your way out of any controversial decisions. Or is it just pure inompetene on the part of the Feds?
SPHeroid
Aug 8, 2012 6:28 PM CDT
The similarity of these people to cockroaches is confirmed.... Turn on the light and they run for cover....  
JimW
Aug 8, 2012 5:11 PM CDT
If the Feds don't like it, it's just too damned bad. If they did their job right, they wouldn't have been caught with their pants down. I am sick of seeing these assholes getting preferential treatment because they have a lot of money. Hell, I remember when a spectator at a Cheney speech stood up and told him he was under Citizen's Arrest for Wat Crimes, and the cops threw the guy out.  On the other hand, I know a guy in L.A. who played his guitar for a coupla minutes in the early A.M. (little 12 watt amp), shut it off, went to bed, and was woken up by police an hour later and hauled off to jail by a Citizens arrest. Some old bag across the street called it in. My question is: Why can THAT arrest be considered legal and mandatory, and Cheney's was not? Big Money again. If you have plenty, you are immune to arrest and prosecution.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne