Snappy newsletters. Simple Facebook sharing. Spirited comments. Sweet features are waiting… GET THEM NOW!

Times Reporter Leaked Dowd Column to CIA

Mark Mazzetti did so without her knowledge, paper says

By John Johnson,  Newser Staff

Posted Aug 28, 2012 7:39 PM CDT

(Newser) – The conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch has brought to light a media flap that could prove embarrassing to the New York Times. National security reporter Mark Mazzettii of the Times emailed an advance copy of a Maureen Dowd column to the CIA last year, complete with the plea, “this didn’t come from me… and please delete after you read. See, nothing to worry about!” report Gawker and Politico. After Times managing editor Dean Baquet initially called it "much ado about nothing," a Times spokesperson followed up by calling Mazzetti's move a "mistake that is not consistent with New York Times standards."

She explained: “Last August, Maureen Dowd asked Mark Mazzetti to help check a fact for her column. In the course of doing so, he sent the entire column to a CIA spokeswoman shortly before her deadline. He did this without the knowledge of Ms. Dowd.” Judicial Watch got the emails as part of an FOIA lawsuit to obtain information about the CIA's cooperation with filmmakers making a documentary about the Osama bin Laden raid. Dowd was writing a column critical of the White House, accusing it of trying to spin the raid to Hollywood.

In this Oct. 18, 2011 photo, traffic passes the New York Times building in New York.
In this Oct. 18, 2011 photo, traffic passes the New York Times building in New York.   (AP Photo/Mark Lennihan)
« Prev« Prev | Next »Next » Slideshow
My TakeCLICK BELOW TO VOTE
4%
32%
3%
4%
45%
13%
To report an error on this story, notify our editors.
COMMENTS
Showing 3 of 5 comments
Winston_Smith
Aug 28, 2012 10:36 PM CDT
I'd be surprised if this kind of thing isn't fairly routine. Both the NYT and the CIA are in the business of finding out stuff that other people don't want them to know, and both institutions know perfectly well that in order to get something you usually have to give something.
stlman1
Aug 28, 2012 9:41 PM CDT
You know both of these two dumbshits below wasted ink space to let you know that the cartoon channel will be in charge of this story. You two better be glad I'm not your boss, you are not management material.
Izman15
Aug 28, 2012 7:52 PM CDT
How dare a print news organization send works to any government body to be fact checked! Don't they know that the only thing legitimate print media outlets are allowed to do is print sensationalized articles full of inaccuracies and inconsistencies! This proves that they are a puppet of the Obama regime since they tried to verify the article before running it, one which lambasted the president for trying to capitalize on the OBL raid. If they had any scruples they would have made up shit about how OBL was actually funded by Obama and the raid was a media ploy aimed at relocating him and ensuring Al Qaeda remains a threat well into his next term. Just cause you have no prove of any wrong doing doesn't mean you cant claim you do. Remember there are known knowns, known unknowns, as well as unknown unknowns. Using that logic the absence of evidence that Obama is in fact a evil space alien trying to weaken the planet for an incoming extra-terrestrial invasion doesn't mean it isn't happening. Good job republican watchdog group, if we confuse fact checking and second opinions with somehow being dishonest in your journalism we can further legitimize Fox and MSNBC and promote shoddy half assed work.
 

NEWS FROM OUR PARTNERS
Other Sites We Like:   24/7 Wall St.   |   BuzzFeed   |   Cracked   |   Timelines   |   POPSUGAR Tech   |   Business Insider   |   HuffPost Entertainment   |   NewsOne