Quote Approval Is Ruining Journalism
David Carr discusses a disturbing trend
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Sep 17, 2012 11:01 AM CDT
   (Shutterstock)

(Newser) – Today's journalists are increasingly faced with subjects who insist on "quotation approval" as a condition of their interviews—and that's a big problem, writes David Carr in the New York Times. Politicians who want to approve quotes before a piece runs reveal "democracy" to actually be "a carefully constructed performance meant to showcase the participants in the best light." But it's not just politicians: Journalists who cover business, entertainment, and other topics have the same problem.

Carr has had his own encounters, and he spoke to 20 reporters and heard "many revealing stories" of theirs. Ironically, most of them weren't allowed to discuss the topic on the record. This "kind of consideration … would have been unthinkable 20 years ago," Carr writes. The result isn't journalism so much as PR. Similarly, reporters are increasingly emailing questions, which means there may soon be no more unrehearsed answers. "The quotation is the last refuge of spontaneity in an age of endlessly managed messages," Carr writes. "Keep in mind that when public figures get in trouble for something they said, it is usually not because they misspoke, but because they accidentally told the truth." Click for Carr's full column.

Next on Newser: Syrian Jets Hit Lebanon
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Quote Approval Is Ruining Journalism is...
14%
7%
6%
52%
14%
6%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 20 comments
gomer99
Sep 18, 2012 12:28 AM CDT
Quit bitching...... It is a natural and obvious response to "gotcha" journalism.
Barbs1133
Sep 17, 2012 5:10 PM CDT
Cowards on both sides.
Winston_Smith
Sep 17, 2012 2:28 PM CDT
This is just politicians rationally protecting their own interests. They know full well that if they give a 10,000 word interview with no quote approval, 99.9% of it will be ignored, while the other ten words will be recycled endlessly, usually mischaracterized and out of context, on opposition news sources for the next week.