Lena Dunham’s $3.7M Advance Is a Big Problem
In fact, it explains what's wrong with the publishing industry: Rob Spillman
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Oct 9, 2012 1:58 PM CDT
Actress Lena Dunham arrives at the 64th Primetime Emmy Awards at the Nokia Theatre on Sunday, Sept. 23, 2012, in Los Angeles.   (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)

(Newser) – Want to know what's wrong with the corporate publishing industry? Take a look at Lena Dunham's insane book deal, which Rob Spillman pegs at $3.7 million on Salon. Random House will need to sell at least 500,000 copies to break even, which Spillman thinks is a long shot. But even if the company pulls it off, "is this any way to run a publishing company?" Spillman wonders. "Put aside the cultural impact question for a second. The whole approach seems short-sighted at best." Imagine if Random House had taken that $3.7 million and instead given $10,000 advances to 370 writers—or even $100,000 advances to 37 writers.

Surely a few of the resulting books would have been better and more successful than Dunham's book, and a few of the writers would have outsold her over time. But "this argument presumes time. Which is what corporate publishers don’t have," Spillman explains. "They have shareholders, and/or parent companies, and must justify their quarterly earnings." That's why small publishers are increasingly winning the big literary awards after taking chances on books that the major houses won't touch. "Random House’s rash deal with Dunham is … why the corporate publishers are losing cultural relevance, and why they might soon lose solvency as well." Click for Spillman's full column—or a column in defense of Dunham's massive deal.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Your Take
11%
6%
11%
11%
59%
2%
59% of people agree
that it's Brilliant
Check Out Another Brilliant Story
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 18 comments
MisterE
Oct 10, 2012 5:09 PM CDT
Why not worry about all the money presidents and their mistresses get to "pen" their "thoughts"?
ZAXXON
Oct 10, 2012 11:22 AM CDT
Not interested in 20 somethings struggling in NY with dad and mom ATMS Didn't 'Rent' cover that shit?
mehrheit
Oct 10, 2012 12:01 AM CDT
Random House must be chock full of believers in The Dumbest Idea In The World (the tyranny of focusing solely on short-term stock price increases).