Senate GOP Blocks Disabled Rights Treaty

Read the comment policy

Showing 3 of 161 comments

Bob Dole's dick fell off when he heard.

It saddens me to read this article summary. A great deal of information is left out that makes it sound like the treaty was/is ALL GOOD, and the opponents uncaring creeps. However there are a few seriously frightening portions in this treaty that, unless the legal language is remedied will not have a positive benefit on US disabled persons. I spent a great deal of time this week listening to the full senate testimony presented last summer concerning this treaty. The issue is not a lack of support for those with disabilities, as the article would imply, but the concern that supporting this UN treaty would actually LOWER standards in the US for disabled persons. The fact is that when the US ratifies a treaty our state laws are superseded by the treaty laws and definitions. This treaty would allow the US disability programs to be overseen by the folks in Geneva. I think the parents of disabled children should be able to say what treatments and programs they want their children involved with, not some committee in another country. Caring parents of disabled children protect children, fight for their needs to be met, and "encourage" a slow paying system to own up to their responsibilities. Take away authority from these good moms and dads and there is no motivation for the bureaucracy to move at all. I'm saddened to hear that John Kerry made those negative statements, but I feared it would be reported in this way. Check the facts. You will see that although the legal opinions presented said "This treaty will have no negative effect..." at the end of the testimony they turned to the person warning about the negative consequences and said, ..."I did not previously understand your argument."  The warnings of the negative consequences were brought by a professor of law, with PhD in International Law, and not an ignorant person. The opposition was not opposition to helping those with disabilities get around in other countries, nor was it opposition to helping other countries improve their domestic laws to improve the situation for the disabled of other countries, the opposition was because of the negative results on Disability Rights in the United States. I'm thankful they voted against it. Once ratified, we would be STUCK with it. Let's get wording in there that protects parental rights for US parents of disabled children. You can check out further information at parentalrights.org Protecting Children by EMPOWERING Parents. 

Truth, Justice and the American Way no longer exists.  The Party of NO lead by Sen. Santorum of PA told the Big Lie to everyone's face and enough of the minority believed it -- even with Bob Dole sitting there in a wheelchair.  But then, Santorum and the truth, are mutually exclusive items. This vote will be more fodder for the mid-term elections!  I am amazed at the utter lack of thinking on the right-side of the aisle.  I can only imagine what Bob Dole thinks... but then Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss unseated Max Clelan in 2002, by claimng Clelan -- a triple-amputee war veteran -- was SOFT on terrorism because he voted against a Bush2 bill that would strip Federal employees of the DoHS of their collective bargaining rights!  And Georgia voters, it seemed, believed an ad that even GOP Sen. John McCain called "reprehensible".  Protecting worker's rights is apparently not on Chambliss agenda... creating bigger government with their lucrative contracts for the military industrial complex is.