Reid, McConnell Close to Deal on Filibuster
But don't expect a return to actually having to talk to do it
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Jan 24, 2013 7:05 AM CST
Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell confer on Capitol Hill, March 6, 2012.   (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

(Newser) – Harry Reid and Mitch McConnell are close to a deal to tweak the filibuster, in an agreement that will likely disappoint proponents of a major overhaul, but save Reid the hand-wringing that would come if he used the so-called "nuclear option" to reform the rules without GOP cooperation. Under the deal, the minority could no longer require 60 votes just to get a vote to the floor, the New York Times reports. In exchange, Democrats would allow Republicans to propose two amendments on all legislation.

Reid also wants to drop the practice of extending debate for 30 hours after a filibuster and to speed up votes on presidential nominees, Politico reports. But the deal almost certainly won't bring back the "talking filibuster," which would force legislators to actually hold forth Jimmy Stewart-style to delay legislation—indeed, senators won't even have to be present to block a vote. And Democrats will still need 60 votes to actually pass bills. But some are optimistic nonetheless. "I think this would be a real boost towards ending the gridlock which has bedeviled us," says Carl Levin.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Reid, McConnell Close to Deal on Filibuster is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 4 comments
Jan 24, 2013 1:48 PM CST
Reid, You are a piece of shit and no better than Boner. No talking means less work for everybody, I guess---and who in Congress wants to give up their part-time status?
Jan 24, 2013 11:46 AM CST
thats what screws things up are your filibuster's Republicant's at their best
Jan 24, 2013 10:55 AM CST
Eh, sounds better than nothing