Next King to Be Dug Up: Alfred the Great?
Archaeologists plan to look for him in unmarked grave
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Feb 5, 2013 12:58 PM CST
Alfred the Great.   (Wikimedia Commons)

(Newser) – Now that Richard III's skeleton has been found in a parking lot, archaeologists are turning their attention to Alfred the Great. The Anglo-Saxon king, who ruled from 871 to 899, is believed to be buried in an unmarked grave at England's St. Bartholomew's Church, and researchers are applying for permission to dig up the spot in question. But it could prove to be a harder job than identifying Richard III, the Telegraph reports, citing an article in the Times.

Whereas Richard still has two living relatives, in Alfred's case, an archaeologist explains: "The problem is, where would we get a comparative sample from? It’s a hell of a lot further to go back to trace a living descendant." But the team believes their evidence that the remains might belong to Alfred is even greater than the evidence the Richard III team had. Their plan is to radiocarbon-date the bones, and if they're from the correct era, start a search for living relatives.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Next King to Be Dug Up: Alfred the Great? is...
3%
74%
1%
11%
2%
9%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 27 comments
right2dave
Feb 7, 2013 7:54 AM CST
I was wondering who was next? RIght?
Libris_Fidelis
Feb 5, 2013 6:06 PM CST
I can't wait for them to start looking for relatives of Jesus !!!!!
kukisvoomchor
Feb 5, 2013 4:35 PM CST
A bit of Wikipedia snooping brought me this: "In 2008 the skeleton of Queen Eadgyth, granddaughter of Alfred the Great was found in Magdeburg Cathedral in Germany. It was confirmed in 2010 that these remains belong to her — one of the earliest members of the English royal family." So that could be a starting point for DNA comparison, one might think. As for living descendents, there are likely zillions as fhm mentions below, (probably including me) so you'd have your work cut out for you to distill out the "purest" among them using historical/genealogical evidence. Glad that's not MY job!