Elderly Woman Denied CPR Raises Ethical Questions
But family is satisfied with care Lorraine Bayless received
By Mark Russell, Newser Staff
Posted Mar 6, 2013 2:04 PM CST
The death of 87-year-old Lorraine Bayless, after a nurse refused to perform CPR on her at a California care home, is raising questions about the ethics of CPR.   (Gurpreet Caur)

(Newser) – The death of an 87-year-old woman in a California retirement community after a nurse refused to perform CPR is raising all sorts of ethical and legal questions. But Lorraine Bayless' family says the woman was aware that there were no trained medical staffers on hand and "had full knowledge of the limitation" of the facility, reports the AP. "We understand that the 911 tape of this event has caused concern," the family says in a statement, but "it was our beloved mother and grandmother's wish to die naturally and without any kind of life prolonging intervention," and she "is at peace." The company that owns the facility, however, says the nurse did not follow proper procedures and the incident is being investigated.

The 2000 Federal Cardiac Arrest Survival Act provides immunity from civil damages to most people who give CPR or use an automatic external defibrillator, and all states have Good Samaritan laws to protect those performing CPR or using an AED, reports Slate. But just 32% of people suffering from cardiac arrest get CPR from a bystander, and surveys show people are frightened of performing CPR incorrectly, catching a disease from the victim, or even being mugged by a faker. However, the Guardian points out that for the elderly, receiving CPR can actually do more harm than good—the chance of CPR working on the elderly can be as low as 5%, but seniors are much more likely to have their ribs cracked and to suffer from a myriad of long-term health problems if they do survive.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Elderly Woman Denied CPR Raises Ethical Questions is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 56 comments
Mar 7, 2013 9:32 AM CST
My neighbor died in the comfort of his own home while watching porn. It was still playing when the paramedics showed up. Wouldn't that be the way to go - without drama, pain, or fear.
Mar 7, 2013 8:30 AM CST
If anything is guilty it's the cost to provide quality nursing care. The family was paying through the nose to take care of her as she ever so slowly died. Anything to keep the golden goose alive. The daughter said that she holds no one accountable. I guess so. No more $100,000 bills. It's getting to the point when dying is more cost effectve than living and the only people that benifit by keeping you alive are the pharmaceuticals , the doctors and those that run the nursing homes. Hell of a thing to hope your parents die so you don't have to keep paying those astronomical bills. Makes you hate nursing homes and doctors all the more.
Mar 7, 2013 6:20 AM CST
Advocates of a family that is not seeking advocacy...so friggin' typical these days.. Life is good so why don't some of you puddionheads get one of your own.