On Today's Docket: DOMA
Supreme Court hears second gay rights case
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Mar 27, 2013 7:16 AM CDT
Updated Mar 27, 2013 7:50 AM CDT
Demonstrators chant outside the Supreme Court in Washington, Tuesday, March 26, 2013.   (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais)

(Newser) – The Supreme Court heard arguments on California's Prop 8 yesterday; today, the federal Defense of Marriage Act is on the docket. What to expect:

  • What is today's case about? DOMA defines marriage as a union between one man and one woman, meaning that gay couples who legally wed in states that allow gay marriage are denied federal benefits. The high court must decide if the federal government can constitutionally do that. The specific case being considered involves Edith Windsor, 83, who married partner Thea Spyer in 2007. When Spyer died, Windsor was hit with a $363,000 estate tax bill because their marriage wasn't recognized. She's suing for a refund.
  • Will Windsor be there? She is expected to be, but her health is declining, USA Today reports.
  • How many people are affected? There are about 133,000 married gay couples not currently recognized by the feds, Reuters reports. The Washington Post points out that while yesterday's case involved people not yet married, today's involves people who are.

  • What are the tax implications? If the Supreme Court strikes down DOMA, taxes for some same-sex couples might actually go up, Politico reports. The so-called "marriage penalty" means that when couples whose incomes are similar file a joint tax return, they don't get as many tax breaks as they would have had they filed separately. That "penalty" could end up applying to gay couples who currently skirt it.
  • How will yesterday's session affect today's? It may not. Yesterday's case could potentially involve a much broader ruling; the court could theoretically strike down Prop 8 and also extend gay marriage rights to all states. But the justices seemed wary of doing that. So, Reuters notes, that case may have little bearing on today's, since DOMA is a much narrower question. And, as NPR reports, it's also "a much clearer question," and the themes that come up today aren't likely to be similar to yesterday's. The only two expected outcomes: Is DOMA constitutional or not?
  • When is a decision expected? Late June. A ruling on the Prop 8 case is expected at the same time.
  • Is there a possibility there won't be a decision? Yes. The Obama administration refuses to defend DOMA in court, so House Republican leaders are defending it. The court could decide that those members have not suffered an injury that would allow them to bring the case, and could thus decide not to rule on it.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
On Today's Docket: DOMA is...
2%
28%
7%
12%
41%
10%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 139 comments
brenda353
Mar 28, 2013 11:35 AM CDT
If you think Lawrence`s story is amazing..., two weaks-ago my mum's girl friend earnt $4027 putting in 10 hours a week from home and the're classmate's step-mother`s neighbour did this for 10-months and got a cheque for over $4027 parttime at there pc. follow the tips at this site, jump15.comCHECK IT OUT
People_Suck
Mar 27, 2013 3:48 PM CDT
More proof that if a group whines long and loud enough it will get what it wants. It's all about the votes not the agenda.
jonnynonos77
Mar 27, 2013 9:53 AM CDT
Legalize polygamy or we are a nation of hypocrites. Consenting adults can either do what they want or they can't. There is nothing intrinsically or logically sacred about a partnership of 'two.' It's just a number.