Just 88K Jobs Added in March
Unemployment falls to 7.6%, but even that's not good news
By Evann Gastaldo, Newser Staff
Posted Apr 5, 2013 7:50 AM CDT
This Friday, March 29, 2013, photo, shows a help wanted sign in front of a restaurant in Richmond, Va.   (AP Photo/Steve Helber)

(Newser) – Unemployment fell to 7.6% in March, but just 88,000 jobs were added—which the Wall Street Journal calls a "very bad number." Economists weren't expecting much from today's jobs report—according to NPR, they were forecasting "slow and steady" growth—but they had predicted 200,000 new jobs. Over the past three years, an average of 160,000 jobs have been created per month.

Journal writers are using the word "Wow" a lot, and not in a good way. "Wow, what a disappointment! Market is heading south," writes Jonathan Cheng. And from Paul Vigna: "Wow, this number stinks! It's the worst since 87,000 last June." Though the unemployment rate had been expected to hold steady at 7.7%, its drop to 7.6% isn't great news either: It came about mostly because so many people dropped out of the workforce, notes Steven Russolillo. The AP points out that the weak hiring could be a reflection of businesses' concerns over sequester-related spending cuts.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Just 88K Jobs Added in March is...
15%
10%
57%
4%
9%
5%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 111 comments
right2dave
Apr 8, 2013 8:25 AM CDT
Obama is doing such a great job as always.
Econ_101
Apr 6, 2013 12:10 PM CDT
Presumptious in´t we ??? I don´t intend to fix the worlds econ. Just the one in the USA !!
Econ_101
Apr 6, 2013 6:26 AM CDT
Gov. is seldom the solution, but it is ALWAYS the problem. I say: Close the gov. for six months and watch the econ. of the USA grow !!