US /
Google Fighting Gag Order on Surveillance Data
Company wants secret FISA court to let it disclose more details
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Jun 18, 2013 3:30 PM CDT
Google wants more leeway on what it can disclose about government surveillance.   (AP Photo/Paul Sakuma, File)

(Newser) – Google is going to court to try to bring more transparency to the government's surveillance program—and maybe to beef up its public image on privacy along the way. The company will file a petition with the top-secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court demanding that it be allowed to provide more information to the public about what it hands over to the feds, reports the Washington Post. The company will argue that the gag order now in effect violates its First Amendment rights.

Even if the gag order is lifted, however, don't expect to learn much more than is already known about the NSA's PRISM program, writes Craig Timberg. But "a high-profile legal showdown may help Google’s efforts to portray itself as aggressively resisting government surveillance," he adds. (Yahoo today became the latest company to disclose more details about the information it has turned over, but the company said it could only go so far because of the government rules in effect.)

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Google Fighting Gag Order on Surveillance Data is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 31 comments
Jun 19, 2013 5:16 AM CDT
Kids, this isn't America. You're having a bad dream.
Jun 19, 2013 2:09 AM CDT
Just more fallout from the Patriot Act. Its only the beginning. Its whats down the road that'll make ya'll shudder.
Jun 18, 2013 8:56 PM CDT
I wouldn't believe a word that Google, the NSA, Yahoo, Verizon, AT&T, or any other coomunications and gov't' rep's say. All you have to do is read their (anti) privacy policies on your phones and their websites, and even they are several YEARS old. Then listen to congress blatantly claim their right to invade your privacy against our constitutional rights. Typical. Face it: It's all old news, and Snowden revealed nothing we didn't already know.