High Court Strikes Down DOMA
Broad ruling declares marriage benefits a matter of equal protection
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Jun 26, 2013 9:19 AM CDT
Updated Jun 26, 2013 9:28 AM CDT
Activists wait for a ruling on same sex marriage at the Supreme Court in Washington, June 26, 2013.   (AP Photo/Cliff Owen)

(Newser) – The Supreme Court struck down the Defense of Marriage Act today, in a broad ruling arguing that it violates the Constitution's equal protection clause. The decision was 5-4, with Anthony Kennedy joining the court's more liberal justices (Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan), and writing the majority opinion. "The federal statute is invalid," he writes, in a quote pulled by ScotusBlog, "for no legitimate purpose overcomes the purpose and effect to disparage and injure those whom the State, by its marriage laws, sought to protect in personhood and dignity."

The ruling only applies to couples married in states that have legalized same-sex marriage. (The court today declined to rule on the Proposition 8 case, which could have made same-sex marriage legal nationwide.) In his fiery dissent—which he read from the bench—Antonin Scalia complained that "by formally declaring anyone opposed to same-sex marriage an enemy of human decency, the majority arms well every challenger to a state law restricting marriage to its traditional definition," the Wall Street Journal reports. For more on today's cases, click here.

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
High Court Strikes Down DOMA is...
2%
2%
14%
63%
5%
14%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 112 comments
ShoeMart
Jun 27, 2013 12:48 AM CDT
Next up for ageless morality laws that created civilization: the Supreme Court rules that murder is now legal!
extremenewsjunkie
Jun 26, 2013 3:37 PM CDT
Ok, gays, listen up. DO NOT HAVE A CASH BAR AT YOUR WEDDINGS. Thanks in advance, extremenewsjunkie.
milerphd
Jun 26, 2013 3:34 PM CDT
Just some questions. Do we really want five people telling us how we ought to think? Is SCOTUS above the legislative and executive branches? How do the people have their say in a representative republic? Even if the people want same-sex marriage (a big "if"), do we make moral decisions on the basis of consensus of opinion? If same-sex marriage is not a moral/immorall decision, how can being against same-sex marriage be wrong? Etc.