Lawyers Halted From Taking $2.7M of $3M Settlement
Pampers class-action suit settlement thrown out
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Aug 7, 2013 12:47 PM CDT
A photo of Vic Mills, the Procter & Gamble Co. researcher who developed the disposable diaper Pampers, is displayed on a table with Pampers boxes and ads from the past 50 years in this file photo.   (AP Photo/Al Behrman)

(Newser) – It turns out there is a limit to how shameless lawyers can be in paying themselves in class action lawsuits. A federal appeals court last week threw out a $3 million settlement that Procter & Gamble had agreed to in a class-action suit over its allegedly rash-inducing Pampers Dry Max diapers, because $2.73 million of that settlement went to the lawyers. That left only a couple hundred thousand to distribute among the few dozen named plaintiffs, who would have gotten $1,000 each, the Wall Street Journal reports.

Unnamed class members were given the right to a one-box refund—something the company had offered independent of the settlement. "The relief that this settlement provides to unnamed class members is illusory," one judge wrote, according to Bloomberg. "But one fact about this settlement is concrete and indisputable: $2.73 million is $2.73 million." It was a 2-1 decision; the dissenting judge pointed out that without the settlement class members would have gotten even less. P&G can now try to have the case dismissed or attempt to work out a new settlement, notes the Journal.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Lawyers Halted From Taking $2.7M of $3M Settlement is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 21 comments
Aug 8, 2013 7:44 PM CDT
Was the law firm Scheister and Scheister, LLC or Dewey, Screwem and Howe?
Aug 8, 2013 7:26 PM CDT
Lawyers, the vultures of commerace. We all pay extra for insurance, many products, cars, trucks, and almost everything else because these blood suckers sue and everypme in commerace has to pay extra for higher insurance. The country needs the "Loser pays" as is the law in most countries. Lawyers are so low in ethics snakes trip over them.
Aug 8, 2013 2:09 AM CDT
Greed, purety ol' greed. To take even 50% would have been shameful. But 90% ? THAT is stealing ! How the hell can they possibly justify stealing 90% ? We all know that they padded the bill at every turn. They should be tarred and feathered.