NYPD's Kelly: 'No Question' More Will Die Sans 'Stop, Frisk'
Meanwhile, Trayvon lawyer calls policy 'slippery slope'
By Polly Davis Doig, Newser Staff
Posted Aug 18, 2013 1:38 PM CDT
This April 26, 2013 file photo shows New York City Police Commissioner Ray Kelly.   (AP Photo/Louis Lanzano, File)

(Newser) – Ray Kelly isn't soft-pedaling the effects if the NYPD's "stop and frisk" policy ends: "No question about it, violent crime will go up," he said today when asked if more people would die without it, Politico reports. "The stark reality is that violence is happening disproportionately in minority communities," he said, adding that "officers have to have the right of inquiry if they see some suspicious behavior." Benjamin Crump, the lawyer for Trayvon Martin's family, called the policy "a slippery slope. No matter what you want to call it, essentially it's racial profiling. And we know Trayvon Martin was profiled for something that night on February 26, 2012. And he had broken no laws." Kelly said Trayvon's case is "a little bit different. These are two civilians. It clearly was a tragedy, but it didn't involve sworn police officers." Elsewhere on your Sunday dial, as per Politico:

  • John McCain on Egypt: The US has "no credibility" and the White House is "not sticking to our values. There is no policy. And there is no strategy. We are much more hated and much less respected than we were in 2009." McCain called for the US to cut off aid.
  • Lyndsey Graham on Egypt: "We're gonna have a failed state in Egypt, and we're gonna have to suspend our aid because we can't support the reaction of the military. Even though the Brotherhood overplaying their hand started this, we can't support what the military is doing in response."
  • Reince Priebus rebuts criticism from Eric Fehrnstrom over debate brouhaha: "I don't know if his Etch-a-Sketch is on tilt. I'm not really taking advice from Eric Fehrnstrom right now. I'm trying to build a party that's year-round. I'm trying to fix a dated digital operation, I'm trying to get a hold of a primary process and a debate debacle"
  • Rand Paul on his fight with Chris Christie: "The party's big enough for both of us. This all started with him saying, 'We don't have enough room for libertarian Republicans.' The thing is, that's how we grow our party. There's room for people who believe in bigger government in our party. Some of the things that he seems to have promoted makes us believe that, well, he seems to think there's a lot more spending that could be going on."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
NYPD's Kelly: 'No Question' More Will Die Sans 'Stop, Frisk' is...
7%
7%
7%
20%
5%
53%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 111 comments
viva_yo
Aug 20, 2013 7:00 AM CDT
Bloomberg's reserves police protection for the wealthy only; the rest of us are on our own. In addition to stop & frisk, this is how NYPD treats average citizens. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbLpDQ-7BwY&list=PL1R9nEvLeXK4mHrTZ3HBHWhIFjiNvMfOB&index=1
Observer
Aug 19, 2013 5:16 PM CDT
Ray Kelly is a Nazi. Let's have every cop that passes him stop him, put him up against a wall and frisk him. Then take his cash and rings for safe keeping. Maybe an occasional kick in the balls just to remind him who's boss. What a jack-off.
Wydeeyed
Aug 19, 2013 10:42 AM CDT
Parodied from Treasure of Sierra Madre "We don't need no stinking constitution". What the mayor is trying to grab is power for the police to stop citizen's without articulate-able cause. Zimmerman indeed. And it's much easier for the cops to murder than for Zimmerman whether they do so out of malice or the incompetence NYPD displayed in shooting the non-English speaking immigrant who was reaching for his wallet. Furthermore the mayor is speaking out of his arse. He has not made a single argument based on evidence or study that the NYPD's actions reduce violent crime to any degree. Where are his stats that reveal the number of these stops that resulted in arrests for felony warrants let alone actually prevented felony violence. What level of reduction is acceptable for the police to have power beyond the constitution? Finally I wonder what level of rage simmers in the community of minorities from this police power that actually lead to more violence because that is at least as real a possibility as the mayors unsubstantiated, read paranoid claim. By the way psychologists hold the view that police have paranoid personalities. In other words everyone is bad to them.