Roberts Adds Rare Democrat to Secret Court
But José Cabranes is so conservative Bush almost appointed him
By Kevin Spak, Newser User
Posted Aug 21, 2013 3:42 PM CDT
A file photo of Chief Justice John Roberts.   (AP Photo/Ann Wilkins/US Courts Circuit Executive's Office, File)

(Newser) – John Roberts has finally appointed another Democrat to the secretive FISA court that watches over the NSA's controversial surveillance programs—but it's security hawks, not civil libertarians, who should be celebrating. Though he was originally appointed by Bill Clinton in 2000, Judge José A. Cabranes leans conservative ideologically, particularly on privacy and security issues, the New York Times reports. Indeed, in 2005 people like Michael Mukasey floated his name as a potential George W. Bush Supreme Court nominee.

Roberts has the unilateral power to appoint judges to the FISA court, and until now only two of the 14 he's appointed have been Democrats—and both, like Cabranes, lean right. Critics have complained that appointing a liberal counterweight might have eased public pressure on the court, as Congress considers reforming FISA. Cabranes won't do the trick; he once dismissed a lawsuit from lawyers seeking to learn if they'd been wiretapped without a warrant, and, in another case, allowed warrantless wiretap evidence to be used in court.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Roberts Adds Rare Democrat to Secret Court is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 23 comments
Aug 22, 2013 12:22 PM CDT
No surprise about this story. You gotta remember Roberts (as a Washington-based private lawyer) was instrumental in helping Dubya win the 2000 Presidential election in the courts (as an adviser to then-FL governor JEB BUSH). Roberts was then appointed to the Supreme Court by Dubya! So this makes perfect sense, since Roberts is the conservative operator on the Supreme Court -- and he'll be around for a long time.
Aug 21, 2013 5:46 PM CDT
The Star Chamber lives.
Aug 21, 2013 4:48 PM CDT
Wouldn't it be nice if the democrats were to actually be democrats, rather than this republican lite we've been suffering under since the 80's?