Does This Head Belong to France's Henry IV?
Scientists disagree on whether it's a royal skull
By John Johnson, Newser Staff
Posted Oct 31, 2013 4:57 PM CDT
This photo shows what may or may not be the head of Henry IV.   (AP Photo/Galaxie Presse)

(Newser) – Forensic researchers have a royal dispute on their hands: They can't agree on whether a mummified head belongs to France's Henry IV, explains the Los Angeles Times. The question seemed settled in 2010 when a team of researchers used facial-reconstruction techniques to conclude that it was indeed "Good King Henry," who was assassinated in 1610. But now a second team of scientists says it isn't so because DNA tests don't match Henry's living relatives.

They wrote this week to the British Medical Journal urging a retraction of the earlier study, and, in fact, two members of the 2010 team agree that their conclusions were faulty. Not so, says the lead researcher from 2010. He explained to phys.org in an earlier story that it's useless to make conclusions based on DNA results in part because the French royals were such philanderers. "It is hopeless to try to match a family tree and a series of genetic links (over) such a long period," he said. Until things get settled, the mummified head is resting in a bank vault in Paris. (In other mummified news, click to read about a big find in Peru's capital.)

View 1 more image
More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Does This Head Belong to France's Henry IV? is...
8%
77%
0%
6%
1%
8%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 12 comments
viva_yo
Nov 1, 2013 12:24 PM CDT
Even if the royal family were a bunch of philanderers, aren't there genetic markers that remain constant in people who share an ancestor?
Mr_Joshua
Nov 1, 2013 4:02 AM CDT
I imagine that after this is all sorted out, heads will roll. And you can call me.................Mr Joshua
dopenstein
Oct 31, 2013 10:37 PM CDT
Psssh screw DNA lets just say what we think it is, wonder how much human history has been taught too children with that practice?