FDA: Germ-Killing Soap May Be Bad for You
And there's no proof it's better than ordinary soap
By Kate Seamons, Newser Staff
Posted Dec 16, 2013 11:13 AM CST
This Tuesday, April 30, 2013, photo, shows Dawn Ultra antibacterial soap in a kitchen Tuesday in Chicago.   (AP Photo/Kiichiro Sato)

(Newser) – The antibacterial soap you've been using religiously? The FDA says there's no proof that it actually stops the spread of germs any better than ordinary soap and water do—and that the chemicals in it may even be bad for us. Some scientists have long warned that triclosan, triclocarban, and other active ingredients can mess with hormone levels, and the FDA today confirmed that some data indicated that persistent exposure to these chemicals could interfere with hormones or lead to bacterial resistance, reports the Wall Street Journal.

The upshot: The FDA has proposed a rule that would require manufacturers to prove that their antibacterial cleaners are safe for daily use and more effective than soap and water in preventing illness. If they can't, manufacturers will have to either reformulate or relabel their products. Not included under the proposed rule: antibacterial products that don't use water, like hand sanitizers, wipes, or antibacterial products used in a health care capacity. The FDA earlier this year announced it would complete its review in 2013, more than 40 years after Congress tasked the FDA with looking into triclosan. Click for more on the FDA's relationship with triclosan.

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
FDA: Germ-Killing Soap May Be Bad for You is...
3%
17%
2%
59%
14%
5%
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Comments
Showing 3 of 15 comments
Ezekiel 25:17
Dec 17, 2013 11:27 AM CST
Been hearing this about all my life. On the latest study I saw that involved testing hundreds of kids throughout a day with random germ swabs and incubator growth, the hand sanitizer using ethanol was the best in preventing germ growth and spread. It was more effective than the soaps. One example is a kid at an amusement park touching the metal restraints on the ride. Swabs showed millions of colonies of bacteria. It spread to the hand that also shows millions of colonies. But after the use of hand sanitizer, the result is less than hundred colonies, a huge reduction and thus prevention of spread of germs to the mouth and nose. BTW, Universal Florida said they will do better with their ride cleaning schedules.
Professor59
Dec 17, 2013 1:01 AM CST
Bar soap is very dangerous, too. If you get caught driving with it in Pennsylvania, it's now a..what...felony?
iq145
Dec 16, 2013 5:57 PM CST
This is very very old news!!!