Hawking's New Theory: 'There Are No Black Holes'
He addresses conflicting theories of physics
By Matt Cantor, Newser User
Posted Jan 25, 2014 3:52 PM CST
Physicist and best-selling author Stephen Hawking appears, Saturday, June 16, 2012, in Seattle. Hawking was taking part in the Seattle Science Festival Luminaries Series.   (AP Photo/Ted S. Warren)

(Newser) – Stephen Hawking helped develop current theories on black holes—but now, he's saying there aren't any. New Scientist explains his thinking, focusing on what's known in physics as the "firewall paradox," which deals with a black hole's event horizon. That's an "invisible boundary" that prevents anything that crosses it from escaping, Nature explains. The theory of general relativity suggests that an astronaut passing through an event horizon wouldn't even notice it. Quantum theory, however, says that an event horizon would be packed with energy—something an astronaut would definitely notice, since she'd be burned alive.

The conflict is known as the "firewall paradox," and Hawking's new theory addresses it. The theory favors "apparent horizons" over event horizons. Apparent horizons hold matter and energy but later release them "in a more garbled form," as Nature puts it. Per Hawking: "The absence of event horizons means that there are no black holes—in the sense of regimes from which light can't escape to infinity."

More From Newser
My Take on This Story
To report an error on this story,
notify our editors.
Hawking's New Theory: 'There Are No Black Holes' is...
Show results without voting
You Might Like
Showing 3 of 113 comments
Sep 27, 2014 9:10 AM CDT
As my theories have said, "black hole" is a misnomer. As gravity is the consequence of the mutual repulsion of space-time and matter, a "black hole" is merely the highest concentration of matter space-time can tolerate within a given volume. That means a "black hole" has no inside and the diameter of the event horizon grows as the accumulation of matter grows.
Sep 26, 2014 10:46 PM CDT
What would motivate him to change his mind all the sudden? It couldn't have had anything to do with http://www.simulationism.net/ If you understand what I am arguing you will realize that the clock is ticking, but humanity is probably too stupid to save itself...
K. Krause
Sep 25, 2014 8:16 PM CDT
From a layman's point of view I can see how black holes can cause theoretical problems. Black holes ultimately require infinite gravity. Nature doesn't do infinity. If it did, then how could anything exist? Evolution, be it biological or astronomical, requires change. Change and infinity are mutually exclusive.